2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of palatal bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
119
4
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
10
119
4
13
Order By: Relevance
“…23,24 Twenty points in each patient's palate were chosen for measurements 16 ( Figure 1). The first step was to locate the incisive foramen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23,24 Twenty points in each patient's palate were chosen for measurements 16 ( Figure 1). The first step was to locate the incisive foramen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 In addition to knowing the cortical bone thickness in this region, it is necessary to know the total bone thickness in order to choose the appropriate mini-implant length to avoid perforations in the nasal cavity floor. [2][3][4]7,[14][15][16][17] Knowledge of soft tissue thickness also helps in determining the overall implant length 18 and implant collar height. 19 Clinical examination, panoramic and cephalometric radiographs have limitations when assessing the amount of bone tissue in the palate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current standard of care for overlay-free imaging in orthodontics is conventional CT. 41 Low-cost office-based CBCT imaging has recently been explored for orthodontic applications, including assessment of palatal bone thickness, skeletal growth patterns, dental age estimation, upper airway evaluation, and visualization of impacted teeth. [42][43][44][45][46][47] Although preliminary results are encouraging, established cross-sectional techniques such as conventional CT provide superior image quality of dental and surrounding structures for advanced orthodontic treatment planning. 41 Low dosing requirements appear to remain a benefit of CBCT when compared with conventional CT, with a routine orthodontic CBCT study delivering an effective dose of Յ61.1 Sv compared with 429.7 Sv for multisection CT. 48 Lateral cephalograms deliver 10.4 Sv in comparison, though without the benefit of 3D structural visualization.…”
Section: Orthodonticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Based on their reduced invasiveness, ease of insertion and removal, the possibility of immediate loading, and their versatility, these devices were increasingly used, even in combination with distalizing devices. Paramedian and midpalatal insertion sites seem to be the most suitable for this purpose 7,8 since they do not interfere with dental movement in the maxillary arch, even if they cannot be recommended in the presence of unerupted palatal canines. On the contrary, buccal interradicular sites may sometimes involve a specific surgical protocol to avoid root damage, require additional radiographic examinations, 9 and represent an obstacle to spontaneous retraction of premolars during distalization of the first molar until screws are inserted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%