1988
DOI: 10.1080/03067318808081669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Assessment of a Corona Discharge Ion Source in Atmospheric Pressure Ionization-Mass Spectrometry for Ambient Air Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12,42] This important drawback was tentatively explained by the respective proton affinities of the analytes, different reaction rates related to molecular weight values and dissimilar response intensities due to differing fragmentation patterns [12] together with the probable depletion of reactant ions in the APCI source during ionization as their humidity-dependent production is not controlled. [43] However we have found recently that these alleged competitions were largely dependent on sampling conditions, [28] and in vitro and in vivo experiments using concentrations of volatiles commonly used in foodstuffs have been found free of any significant selective signal suppression, [28] confirming earlier observations. [1] Nevertheless, as suggested by Taylor et al, [1] given this potential drawback, preliminary tests are advisable to ensure the validity of quantitative data obtained by APCI-MS under specific operating conditions.…”
Section: Linearity Lod and Loqsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[12,42] This important drawback was tentatively explained by the respective proton affinities of the analytes, different reaction rates related to molecular weight values and dissimilar response intensities due to differing fragmentation patterns [12] together with the probable depletion of reactant ions in the APCI source during ionization as their humidity-dependent production is not controlled. [43] However we have found recently that these alleged competitions were largely dependent on sampling conditions, [28] and in vitro and in vivo experiments using concentrations of volatiles commonly used in foodstuffs have been found free of any significant selective signal suppression, [28] confirming earlier observations. [1] Nevertheless, as suggested by Taylor et al, [1] given this potential drawback, preliminary tests are advisable to ensure the validity of quantitative data obtained by APCI-MS under specific operating conditions.…”
Section: Linearity Lod and Loqsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Quantitative aspects were questioned for APCI systems due to possible ionization competition conducting to partial signal suppression when mixtures of volatiles are analysed . This important drawback was tentatively explained by the respective proton affinities of the analytes, different reaction rates related to molecular weight values and dissimilar response intensities due to differing fragmentation patterns together with the probable depletion of reactant ions in the APCI source during ionization as their humidity‐dependent production is not controlled . However we have found recently that these alleged competitions were largely dependent on sampling conditions, and in vitro and in vivo experiments using concentrations of volatiles commonly used in foodstuffs have been found free of any significant selective signal suppression, confirming earlier observations .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the interest in nonradioactive alternatives has grown in recent years. Possible alternatives are, e.g., UV photo ionization lamps, 3,4 corona discharge, [5][6][7] X-ray sources, 8 or nonradioactive electron sources. 9,10 Unfortunately, the generated spectra by UV-photoionization and corona discharge differ from the spectra of a radioactive electron source, so they are not comparable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the constant radiation with predefined intensity of radioactive ionization sources is disadvantageous, especially as it cannot be shut off. However, there are non-radioactive alternatives with variable intensity described in literature, e.g., using a UV photo ionization lamp, 9,10 a corona discharge, [11][12][13][14][15] a micro plasma, 16 or nonradioactive electron emitters. 17 Unfortunately, additionally to the reduced sensitivity when using UV ionization, the spectra gained from UV-photoionization and corona discharge differ from the spectra produced with a radioactive ionization sources, so they are not comparable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%