2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative and qualitative changes in antibiotic resistance genes after passing through treatment processes in municipal wastewater treatment plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
40
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of cultureindependent methods to assess bacterial inactivation by UV or UV combined with other disinfection methods is reported by different authors (Becerra-Castro et al, 2016;Sousa et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2015;Munir et al, 2011;Di Cesare et al, 2016). In a study conducted in three UWTPs with different UV-disinfection processes (oxidative ditch / UV, activated sludge / UV, membrane biological reactor / UV), as in the present study, Munir Lee et al (2017), using a similar UV dose (25.8 mJ/cm 2 and 27 mJ/cm 2 , respectively) to the one we used (29.7 mJ/cm 2 ) also observed limited effects on the relative abundance of ARGs. The apparent disagreement in the current study between culture-dependent assays, where ~2 log-unit reductions were observed, and cultureindependent measurements, suggest that although viable coliforms might be reduced, in general, the microbiota was not strongly affected by disinfection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of cultureindependent methods to assess bacterial inactivation by UV or UV combined with other disinfection methods is reported by different authors (Becerra-Castro et al, 2016;Sousa et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2015;Munir et al, 2011;Di Cesare et al, 2016). In a study conducted in three UWTPs with different UV-disinfection processes (oxidative ditch / UV, activated sludge / UV, membrane biological reactor / UV), as in the present study, Munir Lee et al (2017), using a similar UV dose (25.8 mJ/cm 2 and 27 mJ/cm 2 , respectively) to the one we used (29.7 mJ/cm 2 ) also observed limited effects on the relative abundance of ARGs. The apparent disagreement in the current study between culture-dependent assays, where ~2 log-unit reductions were observed, and cultureindependent measurements, suggest that although viable coliforms might be reduced, in general, the microbiota was not strongly affected by disinfection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on protein level analysis, the ermB genes detected were responsible for encoding a protein consisting of 107 amino acids, where similar gene translation patterns were identified. In comparison to other studies, Lee et al [15] detected ermB genes in the effluent of two WWTPs, even after UV application as the disinfection method. Moreover, Wang et al [6] showed the ineffectiveness of WWTPs in the removal of antimicrobial resistant genes, which were prevailing in all samples analyzed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The removal rates of ARGs and 16S rDNA in WWTP with coag–floc and UV disinfection units also displayed correlation ( p > 0.05). Lee et al () also reported up to 4 log reductions of ARGs for a similarly configurated WWTP. Studies on UV disinfection show that UV treatment alone removes ARGs around 0 log reduction (Lee et al, ; Narciso‐da‐Rocha et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Lee et al () also reported up to 4 log reductions of ARGs for a similarly configurated WWTP. Studies on UV disinfection show that UV treatment alone removes ARGs around 0 log reduction (Lee et al, ; Narciso‐da‐Rocha et al, ). The removal of ARGs by UV alone demonstrate a positive relationship with the dose of the UV applied (Sharma, Johnson, Cizmas, McDonald, & Kim, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%