Quantitative analysis of the development of smart cities in India

Abstract

Purpose Smart cities are an attempt to recognize the pioneering projects designed to make the cities livable, sustainable, functional and viable. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate funding released by the government city wise and sources available for finance for the development of the smart cities. The impact of fund released by the government for the development of smart cities (Chandigarh, Karnal, Faridabad, Pune, Chennai, Ahmedabad, Kanpur, Delhi, Lucknow and Agra) in India has been studied in detail. Urbanization is a continuous process, which is taking place throughout the globe, especially in developing countries like India. Design/methodology/approach The research is descriptive in nature. The sources of funding for smart cities in India have been taken into consideration, and χ2 test of independence has been employed to study the impact of fund released by the government for smart city development in India by using IBM SPSS. Findings The total investment, area-based projects, pan-city initiatives and O&M costs for smart cities ranged between Rs 133,368 and Rs 203,979 lakh crores, Rs 105,621 and Rs 163,138 lakh crores, Rs 26,141 and Rs 38,840 lakh crores, and Rs 1,604 and Rs 1,999 lakh crores, respectively, in the year 2016 (for 60 smart cities) to 2017 (for 99 smart cities), which shows an increasing trend. The investment in retrofitting projects, redevelopment projects, greenfield projects and area-based projects ranged between Rs 94,419 and Rs 131,003 lakh crores, Rs 8,247 and Rs 23,119 lakh crores, Rs 2,955 and Rs 8,986 lakh crores, and Rs 105,621 and Rs 163,138 lakh crores, respectively, in the year 2016 (60 smart cities) to 2017 (99 smart cities), which shows the division of projects funding for smart city development in India. The funding released for smart city development such as other sources, loans from the financial institution, private investment, convergence, state government share funding and Central Government Funding ranged between Rs 14,828 and Rs 15,930 lakh crores, Rs 7,775 and Rs 9,795 lakh crores, Rs 30,858 and Rs 43,622 lakh crores, Rs 25,726 and Rs 43,088 lakh crores, Rs 27,260 and Rs 45,695 lakh crores, and Rs 29,207 and Rs 47,858 lakh crores, respectively, in the year 2016 (60 smart cities) to 2017 (99 smart cities), which reflects the different sources of funding for the development of smart cities in India. The χ2 test of independence has been applied, which shows that there is no impact of fund released by the government on cities for smart city development in India as the p-values of Chandigarh (0.213), Karnal (0.199), Faridabad (0.213), Pune (0.199), Chennai (0.213), Ahmadabad (0.199), Kanpur (0.199), Delhi (0.199), Kolkata, Lucknow (0.213) and Agra (0.199) are greater than 0.05. Research limitations/implications For the Smart Cities Mission to be financially sustainable, the right policy and institutional framework should be implemented for modernization and aggregation of government landholding. Consolidation of all the landholdings under the smart city project should be properly implemented, and the role of private sectors should be encouraged for public‒private partnership projects to make Smart City Mission more successful. Practical implications The benefits of smart cities development will help provide affordable, cleaner and greener housing infrastructure for all, especially the inclusive group of developers belonging to the lower middle-income strata of India, and the benefits will be replicated when adopted on a smaller scale in the rural part of the country. Originality/value The research paper is original and χ2 test has been used to study the impact of fund released by the government for smart city development in India.

Mobilna Uprava – Prednosti, Izazovi I Trendovi

“…Aggarwal i Solomon su rekli: "Pametni gradovi se mogu posmatrati kao pokušaj da se gradovi učine živim, održivim i efikasnim, doprinoseći društvenoj stabilnosti i ekonomskom prosperitetu, a informaciona tehnologija je ključni faktor za implementaciju pametnih gradova." [18].…”

Influência de fatores contingenciais no desenvolvimento de cidades inteligentes no Brasil

“…As such, this research empirically explores the gap in the contribution of contingency factors to the development of smart cities. The implications of this study cover the literature dedicated to the factors that characterize a smart city (Aggarwal & Solomon, 2019;Brandão & Joia, 2018;Caragliu et al, 2011;Chourabi et al, 2012;Depiné et al, 2017;Neirotti, De Marco, Cagliano, Mangano, & Scorrano, 2014;Nevado Gil, Carvalho, & Paiva, 2020;Periphèria, 2014;Przeybilovicz et al, 2018;Oliveira & Campolargo, 2015) and Contingency Theory, applied to the public sector (Avellaneda & Gomes, 2017;Goeminne & George, 2019;Macedo & Corbari, 2009;Park, 2019;Sell et al, 2020;Fiirst & Beuren, 2021), when discussing how contingency factors affect the characteristics of a municipality and may or may not contribute to the development of smarter cities.…”

“…The intensified use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for the development of smart cities must not be dissociated from providing quality of life and prosperity to citizens, nor from enabling local development that generates smart outcomes (Aggarwal & Solomon, 2019;Almeida, Doneda, & Moreira da Costa, 2018). Smart outcomes encompass, for instance, the public finances and resilience of municipalities (Lima & Aquino, 2019).…”

The use of m-government applications: empirical evidence from the smartest cities of Brazil

“…Smart cities and ICT4D (information and communication technology for development) are multifaceted concepts that represent ways of applying technology to improve people's quality of life. Smart cities can be viewed as an attempt to make the cities livable, sustainable and efficient, contributing to social stability and economic prosperity (Bifulco et al, 2016;Yeh, 2017;Aggarwal and Solomon, 2020), and information technology is a key factor for the implementation of smart cities.…”