1999
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.6.3458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Analysis of Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata Activity During a Visually Guided Saccade Task

Abstract: Several lines of evidence suggest that the pars reticulata subdivision of the substantia nigra (SNr) plays a role in the generation of saccadic eye movements. However, the responses of SNr neurons during saccades have not been examined with the same level of quantitative detail as the responses of neurons in other key saccadic areas. For this report, we examined the firing rates of 72 SNr neurons while awake-behaving primates correctly performed an average of 136 trials of a visually guided delayed saccade tas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
65
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
10
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This high background rate is similar to that in another area where the output is inhibitory, the substantia nigra pars reticulata (Hikosaka and Wurtz, 1983;Hikosaka et al, 2000). Unlike the substantia nigra where the response to a visual stimulus is usually a transient pause in activity, with only some neurons showing a rise in activity (Handel and Glimcher, 1999), the response in TRN is consistently a transient increase of activity. Therefore, although the substantia nigra and the TRN both provide inhibitory outputs, the substantia nigra removes inhibition in response to visual stimuli, whereas the TRN produces a transient increase in inhibition.…”
Section: Trn Neuronal Activitysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This high background rate is similar to that in another area where the output is inhibitory, the substantia nigra pars reticulata (Hikosaka and Wurtz, 1983;Hikosaka et al, 2000). Unlike the substantia nigra where the response to a visual stimulus is usually a transient pause in activity, with only some neurons showing a rise in activity (Handel and Glimcher, 1999), the response in TRN is consistently a transient increase of activity. Therefore, although the substantia nigra and the TRN both provide inhibitory outputs, the substantia nigra removes inhibition in response to visual stimuli, whereas the TRN produces a transient increase in inhibition.…”
Section: Trn Neuronal Activitysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Notably, although the connections within the cortico-striato-thalamic "loops" are well defined chemically (excitatory or inhibitory), none of them have individually been assigned a specific role in motor response inhibition. For instance, despite the focus of earlier unit recording studies on saccade-related tonic-pause neurons, more recent work have documented saccade-related "burst" neuronal responses, in the pars reticulata of the substantia nigra, an output nucleus of the basal ganglia (Bayer et al, 2004;Handel and Glimcher, 1999;Handel and Glimcher, 2000;Hikosaka and Wurtz, 1983a;Hikosaka and Wurtz, 1983b;Sato and Hikosata, 2002).…”
Section: Role Of Subthalamic Nucleus During Visual Motor Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to this anatomical dominance of inhibitory input, physiological studies consistently report that most (60 -80%) of the pallidal neurons increase their firing rate in response to behavioral events (Brotchie et al 1991;Georgopoulos et al 1983;Jaeger et al 1995;Mink and Thach 1991;Mitchell et al 1987;Turner and Anderson 1997). Neurons of the SNr belong to the same morphological type as pallidal neurons (Fox et al 1974;Yelnik et al 1987), receive similar anatomical inputs Rinvik and Grofova 1970), and as in the pallidum their behavioral-related activity is not dominated by a decrease in firing rate (Handel and Glimcher 1999;Nevet et al 2007;Sato and Hikosaka 2002;Schultz 1986). Additionally, the soma of neurons in the GPi and the SNr (the output structures) as well as the GPe itself is innervated by GPe GABAergic synapses (Kincaid et al 1991;Sadek et al 2007;Smith and Bolam 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%