2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-019-00704-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer defect in early open-angle glaucoma with normal intraocular pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results had been elaborated by Tong YX in which inferior RNFLT defects had also been reported in the POAG cases. 16 Worldwide it has been proven that the severity of POAG is correlated with progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells, and subsequently the overall thickness of retinal deteriorates. Similar ndings can also be interrelated from our study with other research works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results had been elaborated by Tong YX in which inferior RNFLT defects had also been reported in the POAG cases. 16 Worldwide it has been proven that the severity of POAG is correlated with progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells, and subsequently the overall thickness of retinal deteriorates. Similar ndings can also be interrelated from our study with other research works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kim et al 11 found that low‐tension glaucoma patients with intraocular pressure at or below 15 mm Hg demonstrated localised retinal nerve fibre layer defects closer to the macula compared with high‐teen levels, thus suggesting a different clinical presentation. Similarly, Ha et al 12 found that patients with lower intraocular pressure tended to have localised retinal nerve fibre layer defects closer to the macula, compared with patients with relatively higher intraocular pressure. Xu et al 13 described some differences in structural deficits between glaucoma groups in the peripapillary region, but interestingly no significant difference in the parafoveal region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%