2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of different respiratory specimens on two automated test systems for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many saliva tests utilize a quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to detect viral RNA in subject saliva samples [133]. The demand for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing catalyzed the development of different sampling technologies that test for viral RNA using RT-qPCR, including nasal and pharyngeal swabs [134]. RT-qPCR testing is particularly beneficial due to its relatively low cost and high sensitivity [135].…”
Section: Accurate Alternatives To Saliva-based Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many saliva tests utilize a quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to detect viral RNA in subject saliva samples [133]. The demand for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing catalyzed the development of different sampling technologies that test for viral RNA using RT-qPCR, including nasal and pharyngeal swabs [134]. RT-qPCR testing is particularly beneficial due to its relatively low cost and high sensitivity [135].…”
Section: Accurate Alternatives To Saliva-based Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RT-qPCR testing is particularly beneficial due to its relatively low cost and high sensitivity [135]. While some have reported as much as 20% higher sensitivity with diagnostic assays utilizing nasopharyngeal swabs when compared to saliva samples, saliva samples provide broader testing accessibility and allow for more individuals to be tested in a more comfortable and minimally invasive manner [134]. Of note, self-administered nasopharyngeal and oral swabs, including those used in at-home testing kits, have been utilized in multiplex RT-qPCR analysis assays with an accuracy comparable to tests administered by healthcare professionals [40,41].…”
Section: Accurate Alternatives To Saliva-based Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%