Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-36722-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Volumetric concentrations (µg/cm 3 ) were obtained by dividing the map concentration (µg/cm 2 ) by the X‐ray attenuation length (cm). A detailed quantitative analysis description can be found in . No volumetric concentration could be estimated for the C‐bearing compounds, as the conversion between areal and volumetric concentrations requires knowledge of matrix density and porosity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volumetric concentrations (µg/cm 3 ) were obtained by dividing the map concentration (µg/cm 2 ) by the X‐ray attenuation length (cm). A detailed quantitative analysis description can be found in . No volumetric concentration could be estimated for the C‐bearing compounds, as the conversion between areal and volumetric concentrations requires knowledge of matrix density and porosity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument was operated in 'Soil' mode, which uses a 40 kV excitation and a Compton Normalization algorithm. [20] The analyzer was initially calibrated by the instrument manufacturer using SRM 2709 San Joaquin Soil, SRM 2710 Montana Soil, and SRM 2711 Montana Soil from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, RTC-408 from Resource Technology Corporation, and custom-mixed standards prepared by the instrument manufacturer. The linear calibration ranges for the six elements of interest were 1.25-2.88% (w/w) Ca, 2.89-3.50% (w/w) Fe, 0.0106-3.50% (w/w) Zn, 96-120 ppm (w/w) Rb, 160-230 ppm (w/w) Zr, and 18.9-5532 ppm (w/w) Pb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instrument calibration through a Compton Normalization algorithm [20] and the experiment design are justified for these studies on a number of points. Firstly, infinite sample thickness and homogeneity are assumed for Compton Normalization.…”
Section: Instrument Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative methods fall into two general categories: fundamental parameters methods 78,79 and methods utilizing regression models, which often include Compton scatter normalization. 79 Both methods include standards of at least similar composition and ideally matched composition to the samples. Fundamental parameters methods are most often applied to metallic samples whereas regression methods are used for soils and other similar geological samples.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%