2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitating morphological changes in biological samples during scanning electron microscopy sample preparation with correlative super-resolution microscopy

Abstract: Sample preparation is critical to biological electron microscopy (EM), and there have been continuous efforts on optimizing the procedures to best preserve structures of interest in the sample. However, a quantitative characterization of the morphological changes associated with each step in EM sample preparation is currently lacking. Using correlative EM and superresolution microscopy (SRM), we have examined the effects of different drying methods as well as osmium tetroxide (OsO4) post-fixation on cell morph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, chemical fixation preserves the macroscopic structure of the sample as well as the native nanoscale organization of target proteins. However, true preservation at the subcellular level is not trivial, as known from electron microscopy studies (24). Furthermore, chemical fixation does not immediately immobilize membrane-associated proteins (25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, chemical fixation preserves the macroscopic structure of the sample as well as the native nanoscale organization of target proteins. However, true preservation at the subcellular level is not trivial, as known from electron microscopy studies (24). Furthermore, chemical fixation does not immediately immobilize membrane-associated proteins (25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing of the corneal samples, including dissection of the rims into segments and chemical fixation, could potentially alter the relevant microanatomy. Cellular boundary retraction in response to SEM processing has been described previously, 45 and may result in underestimation of the cellular TZ width compared to the collagenous TM. However, with the resolution of current OCT images, the TZ borders cannot be directly identified in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the cells were fixed overnight at 4 °C in a mixture of 2% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). A drop of sample was spreaded on a cover slip, air-dried, sputter-coated with colloidal gold and the morphology was examined under scanning electron microscope (EVO18 SEM, Zeiss) at an operating voltage of 15 kV 45,46 .…”
Section: Effect Of Flavonoids On the Cell Wall Damagementioning
confidence: 99%