2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying uncertainty in remote sensing-based urban land-use mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods such as artificial neural networks, expert systems, vegetation-impervious surface-soil (VIS) classifications, and support vector machines have been widely applied in urban land-use classifications (Foody, 2000;Pacifici, Chini, & Emery, 2009;Pal & Foody, 2010). Nonetheless, the resolution of the imagery and the heterogeneity characteristic of urban landscapes make it difficult to automatically map detailed urban lands solely using optical remote sensing methods (Cockx, Voorde, & Canters, 2014). The use of ancillary datasets such as census data, road networks, impervious surface coverages, landscape metrics, land parcel attributes, and radar data were recently documented to improve urban classifications (Abed & Kaysi, 2003;Berger et al, 2013;Chaudhry & Mackaness, 2008;Hermosilla, Palomar-V azquez, Balaguer-Beser, Balsa-Barreiro, & Ruiz, 2014;Schneider, Friedl, & Potere, 2014;Soergel, 2010;Wu, Qiu, Usery, & Wang, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods such as artificial neural networks, expert systems, vegetation-impervious surface-soil (VIS) classifications, and support vector machines have been widely applied in urban land-use classifications (Foody, 2000;Pacifici, Chini, & Emery, 2009;Pal & Foody, 2010). Nonetheless, the resolution of the imagery and the heterogeneity characteristic of urban landscapes make it difficult to automatically map detailed urban lands solely using optical remote sensing methods (Cockx, Voorde, & Canters, 2014). The use of ancillary datasets such as census data, road networks, impervious surface coverages, landscape metrics, land parcel attributes, and radar data were recently documented to improve urban classifications (Abed & Kaysi, 2003;Berger et al, 2013;Chaudhry & Mackaness, 2008;Hermosilla, Palomar-V azquez, Balaguer-Beser, Balsa-Barreiro, & Ruiz, 2014;Schneider, Friedl, & Potere, 2014;Soergel, 2010;Wu, Qiu, Usery, & Wang, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our error simulation was based on a mathematic method that assumed mapping error occurred randomly for boundary pixels of agricultural patches, with lower confidence level. However, various factors, such as complexity of the spectral response [65], classification algorithm [66], uncertainty of samples [67], and spatial resolution of data [68], may affect the accuracy of thematic maps. As discussed in Section 4.1, error also occurs between crop and non-crop, which may perform differently when upscaling maps.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capabilities of RS satellites make them a robust and reliable source of data for monitoring the expansion of cities at different spatiotemporal scales [7,19]. In a recent study, Cockx et al [12] reported that landcover and land-use information from remote sensing data is a key component in the calibration of many urban growth models. Van de Voorde et al [81] noted that there is a strong relationship between the change of form in landcover and the functional change in land-use through the analysis of satellite imageries.…”
Section: Urban Growth Sprawl and Changementioning
confidence: 99%