2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1185-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the risk of local Zika virus transmission in the contiguous US during the 2015–2016 ZIKV epidemic

Abstract: BackgroundLocal mosquito-borne Zika virus (ZIKV) transmission has been reported in two counties in the contiguous United States (US), prompting the issuance of travel, prevention, and testing guidance across the contiguous US. Large uncertainty, however, surrounds the quantification of the actual risk of ZIKV introduction and autochthonous transmission across different areas of the US.MethodsWe present a framework for the projection of ZIKV autochthonous transmission in the contiguous US during the 2015–2016 e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, outside of the southeastern United States, a detected transmission event from an imported case will most likely represent only a sporadic occurrence, with minimal onward transmission even in the absence of local control efforts. These transmission patterns are consistent with previous local transmission patterns of other mosquitoborne flaviviruses in the United States, such as chikungunya and dengue, and with other model estimates (9,32).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, outside of the southeastern United States, a detected transmission event from an imported case will most likely represent only a sporadic occurrence, with minimal onward transmission even in the absence of local control efforts. These transmission patterns are consistent with previous local transmission patterns of other mosquitoborne flaviviruses in the United States, such as chikungunya and dengue, and with other model estimates (9,32).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Examples of these matrices constructed using different assumptions and data are given in figure 3 . Matrices were constructed using human movement data from Twitter [ 32 , 251 , 256 ], air travel [ 239 , 249 , 250 ] or public transportation [ 19 ], using movement models that aimed to replicate human commuting behaviour [ 32 , 241 , 243 , 244 , 246 , 248 , 254 , 255 , 257 ], distance [ 242 ] or using a fixed value based on the type of neighbourhood [ 252 , 253 ]. Two studies estimated people's home and work addresses using mobile phone data and simulated movement between those [ 245 , 247 ], and two simulated the short flight distance of mosquitoes by allowing movement into neighbouring cells [ 240 , 245 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 21 studies (21/34, 61.8%) included in the review that used a movement matrix within a mechanistic model to account for spatial connectivity [19,32,[239][240][241][242][243][244][245][246][247][248][249][250][251][252][253][254][255][256][257]; all these studies assumed that connectivity arose from either host or vector movement. These models treated subgroups of the host and/or vector populations as nodes in a network with values of the matrix reflecting movement between those nodes.…”
Section: Movement Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between arboviral transmission and temperature and rainfall is complex and regionally inconsistent [60]. However, up to a threshold, temperature generally has a positive relationship with Aedes spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%