The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp060oa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Quantifying’ qualitative data: an illustrative example of the use of Q methodology in psychosocial research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary interest of Q is subjectivity, and the method is designed to reveal subjectivity such as beliefs, views and feelings on the topic under examination (Brown 1980(Brown , 1991(Brown /1992. The method provides an innovative approach to qualitative analysis' by the way qualitative data are quantified (Shemmings 2006b). In short, participants in a Q study are asked to rank order a variety of statements according to how they themselves relate to those statements.…”
Section: Q Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primary interest of Q is subjectivity, and the method is designed to reveal subjectivity such as beliefs, views and feelings on the topic under examination (Brown 1980(Brown , 1991(Brown /1992. The method provides an innovative approach to qualitative analysis' by the way qualitative data are quantified (Shemmings 2006b). In short, participants in a Q study are asked to rank order a variety of statements according to how they themselves relate to those statements.…”
Section: Q Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Q, it is the respondents' Q-sorts that are subjected to factor analysis, which differs from traditional quantitative research, where the items are factor analysed (Shemmings 2006b;Stainton-Rogers 1995). The emerging factors reveal how participants' sharing views are grouped together, as well as which statements are typically rated positively or negatively by participants on the same factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Q methodology has existed and has been in use as a viable research methodology for some time, it can be considered an emerging methodology in the social sciences. Even though it includes principles of factor analyses, it has been conceptualized as being more qualitative in nature (Shemmings, 2006). Therefore, although it uses methods of factor analysis to group individuals' perspectives, it is not considered to be quantitative in the traditional sense, thus lending itself to gaining an understanding of various perspectives concerning a particular topic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Q methodology, a sample size of 29 participants is considered to be appropriate to achieve an understanding of participants' perspectives (see Brown, 1986), and because of these routine small sample sizes, power analyses are not needed or calculated (Shemmings, 2006). …”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thorough account of Q methodology is outside the scope of this article, but several are readily available (e.g., Shemmings, 2006;Watts & Stenner, 2005a). It comprises both a sorting procedure, and an analysis of pattern.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%