Quantifying public preferences for healthcare priorities in Taiwan through an integrated citizens jury and discrete choice experiment

Schoon, Rebecca; Chi, Chunhuei; Liu, Tsai-Ching

doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115404

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Researchers have begun to explore methods of combining or integrating both survey methods with deliberative methods. For example, Schoon 33 explored integrating a DCE method with a CJ method in her research of soliciting Taiwanese people's values in setting priorities for national health care.…”

Section: Survey Research Methods Deliberative Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Whether a community favours individualistic or communitarian values, there are methods developed to accommodate their philosophical preferences. As community participation gains more traction, there are more researchers investigating improvement of these methods, 29,33,34 and also policy makers basing their decisions on these methods. 35,36 This is a welcome development towards community ownership.…”

Section: Nities' Ability To "Elucidate[e] Cause-and-effect Relationsh...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

From sharing voices to making decisions: The case for centring community ownership in evaluation of health programme planning and management

Chi

Núñez

Tuepker

2022

Health Planning & Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Community participation in health programme planning has gained traction in public health in recent decades. When an idea enters the mainstream, it becomes vulnerable to overuse and dilution, and public health professionals claiming “community participation” may intentionally or unintentionally prevent more meaningful participatory action. The principle of community‐centred planning is seldom integrated into programme evaluation. We have previously argued that, to prevent ambiguity and abuse, a stronger and more explicit idea of community ownership is useful. Un‐like “participation”, “ownership” leaves little room for dilution. Method This perspective piece explores a framework to support evaluating community ownership in planning, by emphasising decision‐making power in health planning and management as a necessary element for evaluation alongside other outcomes. After defining the concept of community ownership, we identify and discuss challenges and research gaps related to implementing community ownership in health programme planning, management, and evaluation. Such issues include considering which communities have claims to programme ownership, alternative approaches to representation and participation that support ownership, gathering community values and preferences, and incorporating them into ongoing programme planning, management and evaluation. We consider methodological issues likely to arise when transitioning from gathering community voices ‐ which is valuable but incomplete work ‐ towards community decision making power in planning and evaluation. Results We use cases from recent policy and research in Chile as examples to consider through the lens of this framework. Finally, we discuss some current constraints in implementing community ownership in healthcare planning and evaluation. Conclusion We encourage exploring how to practice evaluation in ways that will further our ability to be helpful professional supporters of community self‐determination in finding their paths to health.

show abstract

Section: Survey Research Methods Deliberative Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Nities' Ability To "Elucidate[e] Cause-and-effect Relationsh...mentioning

confidence: 99%

From sharing voices to making decisions: The case for centring community ownership in evaluation of health programme planning and management

Chi

Núñez

Tuepker

2022

Health Planning & Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Dialogue and collaboration for sustainable development in Japan and Taiwan: Epistemic foundation of partnership toward Sustainable Development Goals

Nakamura

Chen

2023

Environmental Science & Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quantifying public preferences for healthcare priorities in Taiwan through an integrated citizens jury and discrete choice experiment

Cited by 2 publications

References 24 publications

From sharing voices to making decisions: The case for centring community ownership in evaluation of health programme planning and management

From sharing voices to making decisions: The case for centring community ownership in evaluation of health programme planning and management

Dialogue and collaboration for sustainable development in Japan and Taiwan: Epistemic foundation of partnership toward Sustainable Development Goals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About