From sharing voices to making decisions: The case for centring community ownership in evaluation of health programme planning and management

Abstract

Background Community participation in health programme planning has gained traction in public health in recent decades. When an idea enters the mainstream, it becomes vulnerable to overuse and dilution, and public health professionals claiming “community participation” may intentionally or unintentionally prevent more meaningful participatory action. The principle of community‐centred planning is seldom integrated into programme evaluation. We have previously argued that, to prevent ambiguity and abuse, a stronger and more explicit idea of community ownership is useful. Un‐like “participation”, “ownership” leaves little room for dilution. Method This perspective piece explores a framework to support evaluating community ownership in planning, by emphasising decision‐making power in health planning and management as a necessary element for evaluation alongside other outcomes. After defining the concept of community ownership, we identify and discuss challenges and research gaps related to implementing community ownership in health programme planning, management, and evaluation. Such issues include considering which communities have claims to programme ownership, alternative approaches to representation and participation that support ownership, gathering community values and preferences, and incorporating them into ongoing programme planning, management and evaluation. We consider methodological issues likely to arise when transitioning from gathering community voices ‐ which is valuable but incomplete work ‐ towards community decision making power in planning and evaluation. Results We use cases from recent policy and research in Chile as examples to consider through the lens of this framework. Finally, we discuss some current constraints in implementing community ownership in healthcare planning and evaluation. Conclusion We encourage exploring how to practice evaluation in ways that will further our ability to be helpful professional supporters of community self‐determination in finding their paths to health.

Patient‐ and community‐centered approaches as the cornerstone of health services evaluation in the 21st century

“…A first category of papers embraces the need to do research differently, by acknowledging the dominant scientific community's Western biases, and by taking actions to shift epistemic power towards patients and communities, that is, involving them as co-producers of evaluative knowledge to deliver effective participatory evaluation. Our first category of papers thus offers powerful views about securing community ownership in health services evaluation, 5 ensuring the systematic and meaningful inclusion of socially-excluded and/or historically-oppressed patients and communities, 6 engaging in culturally-reflective and responsive evaluation, 7 and decolonising realist evaluation. 8 A second category of papers, looks at patient-and community-centred care and evaluative knowledge coproduction through the eyes of the providers, that is, health frontline workers and/or health decision-makers.…”