2016
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying influenza virus diversity and transmission in humans

Abstract: Influenza A virus is characterized by high genetic diversity.1–3 However, most of what we know about influenza evolution has come from consensus sequences sampled at the epidemiological scale4 that only represent the dominant virus lineage within each infected host. Less is known about the extent of intra-host virus diversity and what proportion is transmitted between individuals.5 To characterize those virus variants that achieve sustainable transmission in new hosts, we examined intra-host virus genetic dive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
225
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
19
225
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This rapid evolution occurs via a selective transmission bottleneck and continuing purifying selection acting on the founding viral population. While a large and phenotypically heterogeneous founding population size may be unique to this experimental study, recent estimates of transmission bottleneck sizes in natural human-to-human infections are much larger than anticipated by many—on the order of 100 to 250 virions (16). This indicates that the fitness differences within a viral population, rather than the initial levels of genetic diversity, may be the primary factor setting the speed limit of IAV adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This rapid evolution occurs via a selective transmission bottleneck and continuing purifying selection acting on the founding viral population. While a large and phenotypically heterogeneous founding population size may be unique to this experimental study, recent estimates of transmission bottleneck sizes in natural human-to-human infections are much larger than anticipated by many—on the order of 100 to 250 virions (16). This indicates that the fitness differences within a viral population, rather than the initial levels of genetic diversity, may be the primary factor setting the speed limit of IAV adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies include ones that characterize IAV evolution across transmission events in attempts to determine the size and type of transmission bottleneck (919). While some of these studies have focused on the evolutionary dynamics of well-adapted viruses already circulating in these or similar host populations (916), others have instead probed the evolutionary dynamics of maladapted viruses in new host populations to determine the adaptive potential of IAV following cross-species viral spillover (1719). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the adults, our estimate of an infection bottleneck of 25 virions is lower than the bottleneck sizes of other viruses that cause acute infections. The bottleneck size for Ebolavirus is an average of 100 virions, with a range of around 1–1000 virions (20), and the mean bottlenecks for influenza H1N1/2009 and H3N2 are 90 virions and 144 virions, respectively, with a standard deviation of 55 virions for both (28) (Supplemental Figure 2). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the initial benchmarking experiment validated our ability to accurately detect rare variants in influenza virus populations, the experiment was run under relatively artificial conditions. Patient-derived populations are typically less divergent than WSN33 and PR8 (4,5,23), and the number of viral genomes in patient samples is much lower than that found in cell culture. To mimic patientspecific conditions, we generated 20 viral clones, each with a single point mutation in the WSN33 background.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SISPA controls for any errors that may arise during library amplification, including PCR biases. The method has been used in conjunction with statistical algorithms to control for accuracy in studies of intrahost influenza virus diversity (5,22,23). However, the bar-coding reaction used in SISPA can be biased in unpredictable ways, resulting in uneven coverage and sensitivity across the genome (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%