2009
DOI: 10.1021/nl9004332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Electric Field Gradient Fluctuations over Polymers Using Ultrasensitive Cantilevers

Abstract: An ultrasensitive cantilever, oscillating parallel to a surface in vacuum, is used to probe weak thermal electric field gradient fluctuations over thin polymer films. We measure the power spectrum of cantilever frequency fluctuations as a function of cantilever height and voltage over polymers of various compositions and thicknesses. The data are well described by a linear-response theory that calculates stochastic electric fields arising from thermally-driven dielectric fluctuations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(b)] as a result of 1/f-like frequency fluctuations. 11 Even in the presence of enhanced frequency jitter, however, the mean square thermal amplitude remains in agreement with the equipartition theorem Fig. 3(b)].…”
Section: Surface Dissipationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…3(b)] as a result of 1/f-like frequency fluctuations. 11 Even in the presence of enhanced frequency jitter, however, the mean square thermal amplitude remains in agreement with the equipartition theorem Fig. 3(b)].…”
Section: Surface Dissipationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…3(b)) as a result of 1/f-like frequency fluctuations 11 . Even in the presence of enhanced frequency jitter, however, the mean square thermal amplitude remains in agreement with the equipartition theorem The time-dependent force exerted on the SiNW by a single spin is …”
Section: Surface Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was necessary to increase the tip-sample separation to 400 nm for 24.9 K because the magnitude of the cantilever frequency fluctuations caused by surface noise was significant enough to obscure the measurement. 20 Effects due to surface noise have previously been shown to increase with sample temperature. 21 Also, since the measured frequency change became small at 24.9 K compared to the noise, it was necessary to increase B 1 from 1.06 mT to 1.7 mT to increase the polarization fraction being inverted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The known sources of frequency noise are (1) probe head vibrations which cause tip-sample gap fluctuations, which then induce cantilever frequency jitter at small tip-sample separation, and (2) surface induced cantilever dissipation which increases with increasing sample temperature and decreasing tip-sample separations. 20,23 The first source of noise can be managed with probe head vibration isolation, while the latter has no clear solution for every type of sample. The technique demonstrated here significantly reduces the experimental time required for a spin-lattice inversion-recovery measurement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%