2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Qstatistics

Abstract: BackgroundClinical researchers have often preferred to use a fixed effects model for the primary interpretation of a meta-analysis. Heterogeneity is usually assessed via the well known Q and I2 statistics, along with the random effects estimate they imply. In recent years, alternative methods for quantifying heterogeneity have been proposed, that are based on a 'generalised' Q statistic.MethodsWe review 18 IPD meta-analyses of RCTs into treatments for cancer, in order to quantify the amount of heterogeneity pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
298
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 401 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
298
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fixed-effects models were used to combine ORs of having CRP ≥3 mg/L by comparing participants in the lowest to those in the highest group of Mg intake because there was no significant heterogeneity found among studies. Cochran's Chi-square test was used to examine heterogeneity among included studies and I 2 was computed to determine the degree of inconsistency across studies (19,20). Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test(21) and Begg's test (22).…”
Section: Data Synthesis and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed-effects models were used to combine ORs of having CRP ≥3 mg/L by comparing participants in the lowest to those in the highest group of Mg intake because there was no significant heterogeneity found among studies. Cochran's Chi-square test was used to examine heterogeneity among included studies and I 2 was computed to determine the degree of inconsistency across studies (19,20). Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test(21) and Begg's test (22).…”
Section: Data Synthesis and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 In addition, we used the trim and fill method to estimate the number of potentially missing studies that was required to make the filled funnel plot symmetrical.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a random-effects model to conduct all the comparisons. 15 For the meta-regression, the dominant genetic model and homozygote comparison model were mainly used. 16 Dominant genetic models were used to compare the phenotype values of TC+CC genotype individuals to that of TT genotype individuals.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%