2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying co-cultured cell phenotypes in high-throughput using pixel-based classification

Abstract: Biologists increasingly use co-culture systems in which two or more cell types are grown in cell culture together in order to better model cells’ native microenvironments. Co-cultures are often required for cell survival or proliferation, or to maintain physiological functioning in vitro. Having two cell types co-exist in culture, however, poses several challenges, including difficulties distinguishing the two populations during analysis using automated image analysis algorithms. We previously analyzed co-cult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphotextural profiling approach is distinct from classic machine learning methods that distinguish between image features appearing clearly different to the human eye, such as prominent heterochromatin domains in mouse vs. human nuclei [31] or grossly different nuclear morphologies (e.g., hepatocytes vs. fibroblasts; [32]). In contrast, high-content image profiling yields an unbiased assessment that does not rely on any preconception or biased supervision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphotextural profiling approach is distinct from classic machine learning methods that distinguish between image features appearing clearly different to the human eye, such as prominent heterochromatin domains in mouse vs. human nuclei [31] or grossly different nuclear morphologies (e.g., hepatocytes vs. fibroblasts; [32]). In contrast, high-content image profiling yields an unbiased assessment that does not rely on any preconception or biased supervision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these three approaches require advanced knowledge of image processing, programming and/or extensive manual annotation. Other software such as Advanced Cell Classifier are targeted at analysis of 2D data, whilst programs such as RACE, SuRVoS, 3D-RSD and MINS are generally tailored to specific applications (Luengo et al, 2017;Stegmaier et al, 2016;Lou et al, 2014;Cabernard & Doe, 2013;Homem et al, 2013;Arganda-Carreras et al, 2017;Logan et al, 2016;Gertych et al, 2015). Recently, efforts to make deep learning approaches easily accessible have made great strides (Falk e t a l .…”
Section: Motivation and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning uses pattern recognition and computational tools to find functional relationships from the training data with minimal intervention or bias [55]. For example, Logan et al used cell segmentation combined with pixel-based machine learning to identify hepatocytes vs. fibroblasts in co-culture conditions [57]. While use of cell segmentation accurately identified hepatocytes, use of cell segmentation for identification of fibroblasts was not as accurate [58].…”
Section: Computational Approaches To Classify Shape Profiles Into Biomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While use of cell segmentation accurately identified hepatocytes, use of cell segmentation for identification of fibroblasts was not as accurate [58]. Tuning the software to both cell types using defined regions of interest (ROIs) and pixel-based machine learning enhanced the system and resulted in higher accuracy in identification of both tested cell types [57]. Pixel-based machine learning using was accomplished with the usage of ilastik software [55] succeeded by model-based segmentation of the predefined ROIs using the software CellProfiler [57].…”
Section: Computational Approaches To Classify Shape Profiles Into Biomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation