2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying clinical severity of physics errors in high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy using simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is despite the fact that a joint review on clinical brachytherapy uncertainties by the GEC-ESTRO and the AAPM reports that 'the largest uncertainties are at the patient level and related to anatomical differences between the real patient situation at the time of dose delivery and the planned patient geometry and organ definitions.' 22 In prostate iBT various studies could not identify a universally valid threshold value, but determined error thresholds in the range of 1-6 mm that were not only strongly dependent on the individual patient's anatomy and implant geometry, [44][45][46][47] but also varied across treatment plans from different departments. 48 Kallis et al analyzed the follow-up CTs of 55 patients after two days of accelerated partial breast irradiation, that is after four out of nine treatment fractions, regarding both geometric deviations of dwell positions and their impact on dosimetric quality indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is despite the fact that a joint review on clinical brachytherapy uncertainties by the GEC-ESTRO and the AAPM reports that 'the largest uncertainties are at the patient level and related to anatomical differences between the real patient situation at the time of dose delivery and the planned patient geometry and organ definitions.' 22 In prostate iBT various studies could not identify a universally valid threshold value, but determined error thresholds in the range of 1-6 mm that were not only strongly dependent on the individual patient's anatomy and implant geometry, [44][45][46][47] but also varied across treatment plans from different departments. 48 Kallis et al analyzed the follow-up CTs of 55 patients after two days of accelerated partial breast irradiation, that is after four out of nine treatment fractions, regarding both geometric deviations of dwell positions and their impact on dosimetric quality indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, digitization errors of 1 and 3 mm directed along the needle (inferior-superior) were introduced in 5 random needles, by manually adjusting the coordinates of the source position. Digitization errors can occur during a HDR prostate treatment when a needle is incorrectly annotated in the planning software, and occur due to the difficulty in finding needle tips in the transrectal ultrasound imaging used for treatment planning (Rylander et al 2017, Nunez et al 2021. Additionally, shifts caused by a needle moving in superior or inferior direction and an incorrect value for indexer length would cause the same effect.…”
Section: Dvh Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threshold for the magnitude of detectable errors depends on the uncertainty of the tracking method. Simulation studies have shown that, for HDR prostate brachytherapy treatments, single needle shifts starting from as low as 1 mm could be clinically relevant for the patient (Poder et al 2019, Nunez et al 2021. Besides needle motion, there are different possible errors, such as selecting the wrong indexer length or wrongly defined needles in the treatment planning system (Rylander et al 2017, Nunez et al 2021.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation