2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.10.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of αS1-casein in breast milk using a targeted mass spectrometry-based approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, chromatographic or electrophoretic methods have been used to profile major BM proteins [33,34,35] whereas immuno-based approaches, i.e., ELISA or antibody arrays, were the method of choice for quantitative analysis of individual proteins [36,37,38]. More recently, targeted LC-MS techniques have been developed to separate and quantify specific milk proteins [39]. The low throughput nature of these methodologies is often the limiting factor for application to larger numbers of samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, chromatographic or electrophoretic methods have been used to profile major BM proteins [33,34,35] whereas immuno-based approaches, i.e., ELISA or antibody arrays, were the method of choice for quantitative analysis of individual proteins [36,37,38]. More recently, targeted LC-MS techniques have been developed to separate and quantify specific milk proteins [39]. The low throughput nature of these methodologies is often the limiting factor for application to larger numbers of samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast milk samples of the first week postpartum were treated and subjected to LC‐MS analysis as described before with the exception that Synapt G2 Si instrument coupled to M‐Class (Waters Corp.) was used. Dig5 aliquots (see), which had been stored at –20°C, were analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast milk samples of the first week postpartum were treated and subjected to LC‐MS analysis as described before with the exception that Synapt G2 Si instrument coupled to M‐Class (Waters Corp.) was used. Dig5 aliquots (see), which had been stored at –20°C, were analyzed. For reversed‐phase LC, gradients (30 min, flow rate 0.3 μL/min, 0.2 and 0.5 μL injections) were run from 97% aqueous solvent A (0.1% formic acid) to 50% organic solvent B (0.1% formic acid, acetonitrile) using a 1.8 μm ACQ M‐Class HSS T3 C18 75 μm x 150 mm column with a ACQ M‐Class Sym 100 C18 5 μm, 100 Å, 20 mm trap column.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations