2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of vitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in food – The impact of eluent additives and labelled internal standards on matrix effects in LC-MS/MS analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To certify the value of AFB 1 in the CRMs, the matrix effect (ME) of the measurement method should be overcome appropriately. Therefore, an isotope-labeled internal standard method has been adopted to overcome the ME of the LC-MS/MS technique. According to previous reports, matrix effect factors, ME α and ME β , are used to estimate the ME of AFB 1 and isotope-labeled AFB 1 , respectively. Then, the correction factor (θ) of the IDMS method, which is equal to the ratio of ME α and ME β , is the parameter to evaluate the ME of measurement results. , In the study, the calculated ME α and ME β values were 2.43 and 2.42, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To certify the value of AFB 1 in the CRMs, the matrix effect (ME) of the measurement method should be overcome appropriately. Therefore, an isotope-labeled internal standard method has been adopted to overcome the ME of the LC-MS/MS technique. According to previous reports, matrix effect factors, ME α and ME β , are used to estimate the ME of AFB 1 and isotope-labeled AFB 1 , respectively. Then, the correction factor (θ) of the IDMS method, which is equal to the ratio of ME α and ME β , is the parameter to evaluate the ME of measurement results. , In the study, the calculated ME α and ME β values were 2.43 and 2.42, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding indicates that appropriate additives can reduce the need for numerous ILIS, presenting a substantial advantage in method development. Other studies have incorporated additives into the mobile phase, which imposes certain limitations regarding concentration and compatibility with mass spectrometry and the chromatography column. , The approach described herein not only simplifies and reduces costs (the additive is directly added to the sample rather than the mobile phase) but also offers greater flexibility with reversed-phase columns and mass spectrometry. This flexibility stems from their inert nature, high solubility in the mobile phase, and ease of rapid removal to waste.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vitamin D 3 analysis was performed as previously described [ 18 , 21 ]. In short, 0.2 g of previously homogenized pork cracklings, or 0.3 g of raw pork rind, was weighed together with 0.2 g of sodium ascorbate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vitamin D 3 was further extracted with 20% ethyl acetate in n -heptane by liquid-liquid extraction, cleaned by solid-phase extraction (HybridSPE-phospholipid) and derivatized with 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (PTAD) for 5 min in the darkness. The vitamin D 3 was analyzed by LC-MS/MS [ 21 ]. With the exception of methanol used for LC-MS/MS, all chemicals used in the method were of analytical quality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%