2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the interaction between biomaterial surfaces and bacteria by 3-D modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial adhesion has been related to diverse surface parameters in the literature . Among those parameters, average surface roughness has been the most studied with regard to the antiadhesive behavior of numerous substrata . As mentioned above, R a values under 0.2 µm allow for the minimization of bacterial adhesion .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial adhesion has been related to diverse surface parameters in the literature . Among those parameters, average surface roughness has been the most studied with regard to the antiadhesive behavior of numerous substrata . As mentioned above, R a values under 0.2 µm allow for the minimization of bacterial adhesion .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 C ). Siegismund et al [53] showed based on mathematical modeling that in addition to amplitude roughness parameters, such as Rq, also the surface peak density as spacing surface parameter distinctively influences the interaction energies between microbial cell and materials surface. With increasing peak density, the interaction energy increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the oral cavity is an aggressive environment. Material surface in the mouth are covered by the salivary pellicle (up to 1,000 nm thick [39]), which can also alter the nanotopography of restorative material [40], thereby greatly influence surface roughness. Mechanical stimulus, temperature, and pH conditions can also favor additional bacterial adhesion to the prostheses and alter material surface characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%