1995
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.1995.093.01.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Tertiary exhumation from sonic velocity data, Celtic Sea/Southwestern Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…buried shallower than they have been in the past) will exhibit anomalously low porosity ('burial anomaly' of Japsen 1998). Our approach follows that described in detail by Menpes & Hillis (1995) in which interval transit times (ITT -the reciprocal of interval velocity) from wells drilled in an exhumed basin are compared with a normal compaction curve for a ubiquitous, uniform lithology (Mercia Mudstone Formation):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…buried shallower than they have been in the past) will exhibit anomalously low porosity ('burial anomaly' of Japsen 1998). Our approach follows that described in detail by Menpes & Hillis (1995) in which interval transit times (ITT -the reciprocal of interval velocity) from wells drilled in an exhumed basin are compared with a normal compaction curve for a ubiquitous, uniform lithology (Mercia Mudstone Formation):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…buried shallower than they have been in the past) will exhibit anomalously low porosity ('burial anomaly' of Japsen 1998). Our approach follows that described in detail by Menpes & Hillis (1995) in which interval transit times (ITT -the reciprocal of interval velocity) from wells drilled in an exhumed basin are compared with a normal compaction curve for a ubiquitous, uniform lithology (Mercia Mudstone Formation):where m 1 is the gradient of the normal compaction trend, t u is the mean formation ITT for each well, o t  is the constant of the normal compaction trend (i.e. ITT of uncompacted sediment) and d u is the depth of the formation midpoint below the seabed (see also Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hillis (1995), Menpes and Hillis (1995), Japsen (1998), Densley et al (2000), Ware and Turner (2002) have all exploited seismic velocity-depth anomalies to infer the magnitude of missing section around the North Sea, Irish Sea and Australia. In general, the applications use shale or chalk velocities, as these tend to be less variable than sandstones, as a consequence of diagenetic effects, or lack thereof.…”
Section: Pressure-sensitive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, studies such as Hillis (1995) which derive statistically similar apparent exhumation estimates from different formations and different lithologies, also increase the confidence in the normal compaction relation of each formation. Skagen (1992) suggested that shale compaction-based estimates of exhumation have a potential accuracy of ±200 m. Menpes & Hillis (1995) examined the spread of the sonic logs of the reference wells around the normal compaction relation for the Upper Cretaceous Chalk in the Celtic Sea/South-Western Approaches, and suggested that an empirical estimate of the error in the apparent exhumation relation was ± 250 m. A potential error in the normal compaction relation of ± 250 m is also suggested for this study.…”
Section: Barmston-1mentioning
confidence: 99%