Phanerozoic Regional Geology of the World 2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53042-4.00022-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uplift, denudation, and their causes and constraints over geological timescales

Abstract: We define uplift and denudation, then review the basic principles underlying the mechanisms for producing uplift, and the methodologies used to quantify the geological timescale denudation history of uplifted regions. Uplift is represents work done against gravity, and does not necessarily lead immediately to rapid denudation. The causes of uplift can be categorised according to the principal driving mechanism -stress, thermal or gravitational factor, although all three can operate to varying degrees. Simple f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High clay distribution was obtained in the northeastern (arable farm) part of the area under study. This may be attributed to the structural factor like land denudation (Kerry, 2012). Also, well-reflected changes were observed in the spatial distribution for Available P, Nitrogen, and CEC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…High clay distribution was obtained in the northeastern (arable farm) part of the area under study. This may be attributed to the structural factor like land denudation (Kerry, 2012). Also, well-reflected changes were observed in the spatial distribution for Available P, Nitrogen, and CEC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In this paper, we focus on estimating net erosion from compaction data. If a reference porosity-depth curve (describing normal compaction) can be established for a given lithology, the depth difference between that and the porosity derived from well log data is an estimate of net erosion ( Figure 1) (see Gallagher, 2012, and references therein). normal compaction) is the basis of this approach (Athy, 1930;Magara, 1980;Sclater & Christie, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an erosion event in the geological past, the sediments underlying the associated unconformity will today exhibit lower porosity than expected at the present day burial depth. If a reference porosity-depth curve (describing normal compaction) can be established for a given lithology, the depth difference between that and the porosity derived from well log data is an estimate of net erosion (Figure 1) (see Gallagher, 2012, and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acordo com Bishop (1995), esse processo corresponde à transferência parcial ou total do fl uxo de um rio para outro, podendo ocorrer em diferentes escalas espaciais. Rearranjos podem estar relacionados a mudanças no nível de base e permitem a fusão de sistemas fl uviais previamente desconectados ou a divisão/desvio de um sistema já existente (GALLAGHER, 2012). A captura fl uvial é o mais notável tipo de rearranjo e se caracteriza pela transferência de área entre bacias, porém, com a preservação das linhas de drenagem (BISHOP, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified