2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Prostate and Seminal Vesicle Interfraction Variation During IMRT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
72
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was also seen in two previous studies, one using MV CT (tomotherapy) (20) and a second using CT on rails (21). As noted in the present study, this AP systematic shift is caused mostly by bony misalignment and not internal prostate motion.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Techniquessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This was also seen in two previous studies, one using MV CT (tomotherapy) (20) and a second using CT on rails (21). As noted in the present study, this AP systematic shift is caused mostly by bony misalignment and not internal prostate motion.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Techniquessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Changes in bladder volume allows for an increase in interfraction motion, hence affecting CTV coverage. This is a concern, particularly when studies such as Frank et al (12) have shown that 90% of time the bladder volume is found to be smaller than the planned volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying intensity-modulated RT in combination with offline or online image-guided setup correction protocols, toxicity can be reduced (2). Presently, prostate setup correction protocols focus mainly on reducing the error caused by interfraction prostate motion (3)(4)(5)(6), although more institutes these days are starting to study the effect of intrafraction prostate motion (7,8). Many different imaging techniques can be used, for example, ultrasound, portal imaging, megavolt computed tomography (CT), in-room CT, cone beam CT (CBCT), in-room magnetic resonance imaging, and four-dimensional (4D) marker-based localization systems like Calypso (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%