2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Interfraction Prostate Motion Using Megavoltage Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
57
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The previously reported range of inter-fractional motion of the prostate, as measured by a standard deviation from the initial setup, was 0.7 -5.2 mm for all directions [2] [3] [8]- [13]. Table 3 lists the previous studies of the daily inter-fractional motions of the prostate measured by various image guidance methods [5]- [7]. Bylund et al reported a total of 984 daily megavoltage CBCT images from 24 patients undergoing definitive IMRT for localized prostate cancer; the mean displacement of the inter-fractional motion was 4.8, 2.9, and 2.1 mm in the AP, LR, and SI directions, respectively [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The previously reported range of inter-fractional motion of the prostate, as measured by a standard deviation from the initial setup, was 0.7 -5.2 mm for all directions [2] [3] [8]- [13]. Table 3 lists the previous studies of the daily inter-fractional motions of the prostate measured by various image guidance methods [5]- [7]. Bylund et al reported a total of 984 daily megavoltage CBCT images from 24 patients undergoing definitive IMRT for localized prostate cancer; the mean displacement of the inter-fractional motion was 4.8, 2.9, and 2.1 mm in the AP, LR, and SI directions, respectively [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 lists the previous studies of the daily inter-fractional motions of the prostate measured by various image guidance methods [5]- [7]. Bylund et al reported a total of 984 daily megavoltage CBCT images from 24 patients undergoing definitive IMRT for localized prostate cancer; the mean displacement of the inter-fractional motion was 4.8, 2.9, and 2.1 mm in the AP, LR, and SI directions, respectively [5]. Scarbrough et al investigated the inter-fractional motions of the prostate in 40 patients using ultrasound and fiducial seed markers; with ultrasound, the rates of <5 mm inter-fractional motion were 61.4%, 69.3%, and 59.6% in the AP, LR, SI directions respectively, and, with fiducial seed markers, were 64.5%, 78.4%, and 68.4% in the AP, LR, SI directions,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study by Bylund et al 20 patients were given no direction regarding bladder or bowel emptying, diet or laxative use. They observed that the internal prostate motion was 3.8 mm when the setup was performed according to bony structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9] In the literature, the prostate motion has been well described while SV motion and dosimetric analysis have been relatively less well reported. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] When the SV are included in the target volume, independent motion and the rotation of the SV and prostate may affect the dose distribution of the SV in prostate based image guidance. Stenmark et al showed that the displacement of the SV was different from the prostate and this movement was more in the distal part rather than the proximal part of SV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%