2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2012.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Myocardial Area at Risk: Validation of Coronary Angiographic Scores With Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study results demonstrate modest but similar correlation (r = 20.34, P , .0001) with FFR as had been described for conventional angiography (11). We also demonstrated that the score is highly reproducible, with minimal interobserver variability, which is in agreement with previous reports (11,18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study results demonstrate modest but similar correlation (r = 20.34, P , .0001) with FFR as had been described for conventional angiography (11). We also demonstrated that the score is highly reproducible, with minimal interobserver variability, which is in agreement with previous reports (11,18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Table E1 (online) demonstrates the derivation of the APPROACH score, as has been previously described (17). Furthermore, it has been validated with cardiac MR imaging methods to quantify the myocardial area at risk after myocardial infarction (18). The modified score takes into account the location of the lesion (proximal, middle, or distal) and the dominance and size of the secondary branches and provides an estimate of the percentage of supplied myocardium beyond the considered coronary lesion (17).…”
Section: Modified Approach Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angiographic scoring systems have been developed to include both the severity of coronary stenosis and the volume of the myocardium subtended distal to the lesion. Moral et al previously demonstrated that the BARI score accurately estimates the amount of the jeopardized myocardium based on the evaluations of infarct size using cardiac MRI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [12]. The myocardial jeopardy score was calculated from an anatomic representation of the size and distribution of the coronary arteries [12,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image analysis was conducted on a workstation (Cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada) by 2 cardiologists specialized in cardiac imaging. Data on reproducibility, inter-and intraobserver variability have been previously published [32].…”
Section: Cmr Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%