2008
DOI: 10.5194/acpd-8-7781-2008
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of impact of climate uncertainty on regional air quality

Abstract: Abstract. Impacts of uncertain climate forecasts on future regional air quality are investigated using downscaled MM5 meteorological fields from the NASA GISS and MIT IGSM global climate models and the CMAQ model in 2050 in the continental US. Three future climate scenarios: high-extreme, low-extreme and base, are developed for regional air quality simulations. GISS, with the IPCC A1B scenario, is used for the base case. IGSM results, in the form of probabilistic distributions, are used to perturb the base cas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although regional-scale modelling needs more detailed information on anthropogenic and natural emission inventories as well as information for their chemical boundaries from GCCMs, a number of recent studies address the regional scale future AQ, both for Europe (Szopa et al 2006, Hedegaard et al 2008, Zlatev 2010 and North America (Steiner et al 2006, Bell et al 2007, Tagaris et al 2007, Holloway et al 2008, Nolte et al 2008, Wu et al 2008, Liao et al 2009). Most of the studies dealt solely with ozone (O 3 ), some of them also with particulate matter (PM) (Racherla & Adams 2006, Tagaris et al 2007, Liao et al 2009), while Hedegaard et al (2008) simulated future levels of sulphur (SO 2 ) and nitrogen (NO 2 ) dioxides as well. Recently, Jacob & Winner (2009) reviewed current knowledge of the effect of climate change on AQ with focus on 21st century projections for O 3 and PM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although regional-scale modelling needs more detailed information on anthropogenic and natural emission inventories as well as information for their chemical boundaries from GCCMs, a number of recent studies address the regional scale future AQ, both for Europe (Szopa et al 2006, Hedegaard et al 2008, Zlatev 2010 and North America (Steiner et al 2006, Bell et al 2007, Tagaris et al 2007, Holloway et al 2008, Nolte et al 2008, Wu et al 2008, Liao et al 2009). Most of the studies dealt solely with ozone (O 3 ), some of them also with particulate matter (PM) (Racherla & Adams 2006, Tagaris et al 2007, Liao et al 2009), while Hedegaard et al (2008) simulated future levels of sulphur (SO 2 ) and nitrogen (NO 2 ) dioxides as well. Recently, Jacob & Winner (2009) reviewed current knowledge of the effect of climate change on AQ with focus on 21st century projections for O 3 and PM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore the spatial distribution of lower tropospheric ozone is highly variable due to its relatively short lifetime (of the order of hours to days) and therefore a regional context is especially important to investigate climate change effects on tropospheric ozone [ Giorgi and Meleux , 2007]. Recently an increasing number of studies has appeared in the literature based on regional models focusing on Europe [e.g., Szopa et al , 2006; Meleux et al , 2007; Giorgi and Meleux , 2007; Krüger et al , 2008; Katragkou et al , 2010; Andersson and Engardt , 2010] and North America [e.g., Steiner et al , 2006; Tagaris et al , 2007, 2008; Holloway et al , 2008; Nolte et al , 2008; Weaver et al , 2009, Liao et al , 2009]. These studies investigated climate change effects on tropospheric ozone at the regional scale using off‐line coupling of regional climate or meteorological mesoscale models with regional air quality and chemistry transport models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For PM 2.5 , we use a 1% increase in all‐cause mortality per 1 μg/m 3 increase in annual PM 2.5 concentrations as our central estimate, with 0.3% and 2.0% as lower and upper bounds, respectively. Note that although NO x may influence different components of PM 2.5 (e.g., sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium), C‐R functions usually do not account for PM 2.5 composition. Therefore, we use the total PM 2.5 concentration output from the CMAQ simulations when applying the coefficients of C‐R functions summarized here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%