2018 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility and 2018 IEEE Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Comp 2018
DOI: 10.1109/isemc.2018.8393838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of EMI for power-ground plane and novel EBG structure for SSN suppression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure , there are three stopbands (the gray areas) in the frequency range from about 0.5 to 0.9 GHz, from 1.1 to 1.35 GHz, and from 1.5 to 1.55 GHz, which means the resonant modes caused by SSN will be suppressed within these stopbands. These stopbands are different from the suppression bandgap of insertion loss, and it is mainly because the suppression band of the insertion loss is extracted for a finite number of EBG structures. Moreover, a bandgap implies the absence of propagating modes, whereas, a suppression band does not imply the absence of propagating modes …”
Section: Transmission Performance Of the Novel Ebgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure , there are three stopbands (the gray areas) in the frequency range from about 0.5 to 0.9 GHz, from 1.1 to 1.35 GHz, and from 1.5 to 1.55 GHz, which means the resonant modes caused by SSN will be suppressed within these stopbands. These stopbands are different from the suppression bandgap of insertion loss, and it is mainly because the suppression band of the insertion loss is extracted for a finite number of EBG structures. Moreover, a bandgap implies the absence of propagating modes, whereas, a suppression band does not imply the absence of propagating modes …”
Section: Transmission Performance Of the Novel Ebgmentioning
confidence: 99%