2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of crystalline cellulose in lignocellulosic biomass using sum frequency generation (SFG) vibration spectroscopy and comparison with other analytical methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
97
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to note that the isolation of cellulose microfibrils in these studies often involves harsh extraction methods that will affect the native cel- lulose structure (Somerville, 2006). A sum frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy was recently used to detect the asymmetric distribution of C6H2 and O3H-O5 group in crystalline cellulose microfibrils (Hieu et al, 2011;Barnette et al, 2012). SFG is a desirable method to estimate the content of crystalline cellulose because there is no spectral interference from other cell wall matrix compounds such as hemicellulose and lignin and it does not require any chemical treatment of biological samples (Barnette et al, 2012).…”
Section: General Structure Of Cellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is important to note that the isolation of cellulose microfibrils in these studies often involves harsh extraction methods that will affect the native cel- lulose structure (Somerville, 2006). A sum frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy was recently used to detect the asymmetric distribution of C6H2 and O3H-O5 group in crystalline cellulose microfibrils (Hieu et al, 2011;Barnette et al, 2012). SFG is a desirable method to estimate the content of crystalline cellulose because there is no spectral interference from other cell wall matrix compounds such as hemicellulose and lignin and it does not require any chemical treatment of biological samples (Barnette et al, 2012).…”
Section: General Structure Of Cellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sum frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy was recently used to detect the asymmetric distribution of C6H2 and O3H-O5 group in crystalline cellulose microfibrils (Hieu et al, 2011;Barnette et al, 2012). SFG is a desirable method to estimate the content of crystalline cellulose because there is no spectral interference from other cell wall matrix compounds such as hemicellulose and lignin and it does not require any chemical treatment of biological samples (Barnette et al, 2012). SFG can also detect subtle changes in cellulose ordering and packing in secondary cell wall in Arabidopsis inflorescence stem (Park et al, 2013).…”
Section: General Structure Of Cellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12] These various forms of SFG microscopy have been used to study a growing number of spatially heterogeneous samples, including patterned molecular monolayers on planar surfaces 7 , biomolecular microcrystals [13][14] and biofibers. 9,[15][16] Among the various forms of SFG microscopy, the point-scanning configuration with collinear excitation beams is attractive because the microscope layout is similar to a standard laser-scanning nonlinear optical microscope. 17 This configuration not only enables fast scanning capabilities with sub-micrometer lateral resolution, but also allows the simultaneous recording of images based on alternative forms of nonlinear optical contrast such as nonresonant second harmonic generation (SHG) 18 , which is especially useful when imaging microscopic structures with intrinsic non-centrosymmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although XRD has been used widely to estimate cellulose crystallinity in secondary cell walls and lignocellulosic biomass, crystallinity measurements are inaccurate, as the value varies greatly with the data-fitting methods (Barnette et al, 2012). Likewise, spectral overlaps or interference from noncellulosic matrix polymers make it challenging to analyze cellulose structure in intact plant cell walls with 13 C-NMR and Raman and IR spectroscopy (Park et al, 2010).Sum frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy has the potential to selectively detect crystalline cellulose without spectral interference from other wall components (Barnette et al, 2011(Barnette et al, , 2012. SFG is a nonlinear optical process that occurs in crystalline materials with a noncentrosymmetric structure or at interfaces (Chen et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%