2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of bindings of organometallic ruthenium complexes to GSTπ by mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibition of GSTs by ruthenium compounds is already well established . Furthermore, more recently, and now 66 years after the first report by Dwyer and Gyarfas in 1952, ruthenium‐based complexes have been rediscovered as potential anti‐cholinesterase agents with interesting pharmaceutical potential …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibition of GSTs by ruthenium compounds is already well established . Furthermore, more recently, and now 66 years after the first report by Dwyer and Gyarfas in 1952, ruthenium‐based complexes have been rediscovered as potential anti‐cholinesterase agents with interesting pharmaceutical potential …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, our group reported a quantitative MS method for determination of the ratio of ruthenium complex‐bound peptides with a specific isotopic labelling strategy to amine groups of peptides using NAS . This method was successful in determining the binding ratio of ruthenium anticancer complexes to Cys15, Cys48, Met92 and Cys102 in GST‐π.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was successful in determining the binding ratio of ruthenium anticancer complexes to Cys15, Cys48, Met92 and Cys102 in GST‐π. However, when the NAS isotopic labelling occurred only at the N‐terminal, the mass difference between light and heavy peptides was only 3 Da, where the isotopic signals may overlap, so a correction based on the isotopic ratios of the peptide pair was required for accurate quantification . Moreover, as the NAS labelling is applied to terminal amines and amines of lysine in the side chain, the primary MS‐based quantification cannot distinguish the exact binding sites at the single residue level if there is more than one binding site in a metallated peptide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations