1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00379-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumours: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
494
5
36

Year Published

1998
1998
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 656 publications
(553 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
13
494
5
36
Order By: Relevance
“…in selected regions with elevated vascular density (Weidner et al, 1991;Vermeulen et al, 1996). The discrepancy between our study and these studies cannot be attributed to the use of different procedures for assessment of vascular density either.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…in selected regions with elevated vascular density (Weidner et al, 1991;Vermeulen et al, 1996). The discrepancy between our study and these studies cannot be attributed to the use of different procedures for assessment of vascular density either.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Since then, similar correlations have been observed in a variety of histological types of human cancer (Weidner, 1993(Weidner, , 1995, leading to the suggestion that the rate of angiogenesis may be an independent prognostic indicator in malignant diseases (Vermeulen et al, 1996). In accordance with this suggestion, recent studies of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix have shown that high vascular density in the primary tumour is correlated with vascular space invasion, lymphatic involvement and pelvic lymph node metastasis (Wiggins et al, 1995;Bremer et al, 1996;Hawighorst et al, 1997), and may predict low recurrence-free and overall survival probabilities (Schlenger et al, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For some authors, CD31 seems to be the most sensitive marker for the endothelial cells and consistently stains more vessels than did factor VIII (Horak et al, 1992). An international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation of microvessel density proposed that anti-CD31 monoclonal antibody should be the standard for microvessel assessment (Vermeulen et al, 1996) as it is superior on paraffin sections. But as CD34 has been shown to yield higher microvessel values than CD31 or factor VIII in breast cancer (Martin et al, 1997), it might be useful to combine CD34 and CD31 antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We regarded as a distinct countable microvessel any highlighted endothelial cell or cell cluster clearly separated from adjacent microvessels, tumour cells, normal cells and other connective tissue elements according to the international consensus (Vermeulen et al, 1996).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Vascularitymentioning
confidence: 99%