2016
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2481078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Additional Asset Reinforcement Cost From 3-Phase Imbalance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automatic phase swapping devices could be installed at these locations for more efficient and frequent responses. 4 The r-LAPB with s = 4 typically requires around 10 ∼ 12 hours to solve one instance.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Automatic phase swapping devices could be installed at these locations for more efficient and frequent responses. 4 The r-LAPB with s = 4 typically requires around 10 ∼ 12 hours to solve one instance.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the increasing variability coming from end users requires DSOs to revisit this old problem with modern techniques. Imbalanced three phases could lead to higher risks of equipment failures [1], increased delivery losses [2], potential relay malfunctioning [3], additional asset reinforcement costs [4], and issues related with voltage imbalances [5][6][7][8]. In particular, there is increasing need to develop solutions that can keep three phases balanced in the presence of high uncertainties from end users over a period of time (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase unbalance wastes the capacity of LV feeders. For a feeder with unbalanced three phases, when the capacity of the heaviest phase is used up, the space capacity of the other two phases cannot be transferred to the heaviest phase, thus resulting in network investment being earlier than if the three phases were balanced [10]. Additional investment costs arise from such an unbalance-induced capacity waste.…”
Section: Consequences Of Phase Unbalancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the three phases of a distribution network were balanced when the network was initially constructed, phase unbalance appears and accumulates over K. Ma time with loads being added to and removed from each phase. Phase unbalance causes a number of consequences: 1) additional network investment costs because of the inefficient use of network assets [10], [11], [12]; 2) extra energy losses in the transformer, on the phases and neutral, and in the ground [12], [13], [14]; 3) nuisance tripping [15]; and 4) damages to induction motors [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an imbalance leads to: 1) neutral wire energy losses up to hundreds of millions of British pounds each year in the UK's distribution networks [2], [3]; and 2) additional network investment cost amounting to billions of British pounds each year [4], [5]. Major causes for this issue are uneven load allocations across the three phases and random load behaviors [6], [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%