2015
DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2015.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of a Distributive Fluvial System: The Salt Wash DFS of the Morrison Formation, SW U.S.A.

Abstract: Recent analysis of modern aggradational continental sedimentary basins reveals that sedimentation patterns are dominated by distributive fluvial systems (DFSs). The Salt Wash Member of the Late Jurassic Morrison Formation has previously been described as a fan-shaped fluvial system. This study characterizes facies variations across the Salt Wash DFS to quantitatively test predicted trends in conceptual DFS models. Notable proximal-to-distal trends include a change in total thickness of the fluvial succession f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
176
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
13
176
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Raines et al (2013) attributed this to the propagation of transverse drainage systems across the foredeep. Additionally, the Morrison Formation in Utah has been shown to include the record of transverse sediment dispersal by distributive fluvial systems Owen et al, 2015). Previously, Upper Jurassic strata in Montana have been assigned to a backbulge setting with passage of the forebulge interpreted to have created the sub-Cretaceous un con formity (DeCelles, 2004;Fuentes et al, 2009;.…”
Section: Late Jurassicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raines et al (2013) attributed this to the propagation of transverse drainage systems across the foredeep. Additionally, the Morrison Formation in Utah has been shown to include the record of transverse sediment dispersal by distributive fluvial systems Owen et al, 2015). Previously, Upper Jurassic strata in Montana have been assigned to a backbulge setting with passage of the forebulge interpreted to have created the sub-Cretaceous un con formity (DeCelles, 2004;Fuentes et al, 2009;.…”
Section: Late Jurassicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception to this meanderbelt 825 form is observed on the Beni River DFS, where the channel belts remained in a location for long enough 826 to produce an amalgamated channel belt form (Fig.21C). These different forms of meander belts will 827 produce very different sand body geometries in the rock record, where lack of amalgamation will result 828 in discrete ribbon sandstone geometries (e.g., Owen et al, 2015b) and an amalgamated meander belt 829 will produce a complex sheet sandstone with multiple pointbar accretion directions (e.g., Hartley et 830 al.,2015). Thus, channel belt sandstone geometries offer clues as to the position or process in the 831 sedimentary basin.…”
Section: Differences Between Dfs and Tributary Rivers In Sedimentary mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The succession is interpreted to represent a large DFS that flowed in a north to northeast direction ( Fig. 1; Craig et al, 1956;Mullens and Freeman, 1957;Owen et al, 2015aOwen et al, , 2015b. The system comprises large-scale amalgamated channel belt deposits that can extend tens of kilometers laterally in the proximal region.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system comprises large-scale amalgamated channel belt deposits that can extend tens of kilometers laterally in the proximal region. Downstream, channel belts pass progressively into floodplain facies composed of poorly developed paleosols, ribbon channels, and minor lacustrine units (Owen et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%