2004
DOI: 10.7202/1055004ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quand le social occulte la question nationale pour cause de bien commun recherché ou… les hésitations de madame Françoise David concernant la question nationale du Québec

Abstract: Tous droits réservés © Association québécoise d'histoire politique; VLB Éditeur, 2004 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit.Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting debate in this respect is occurring at the margin of Québec's party system where a new party, Option citoyenne , spearheaded by feminist activists, is tackling ‘the great taboo of the national question’ by disentangling sovereignty and socialism and prioritising the latter (Conradi et al 2004). Published replies to this approach stated that one would have to be ‘blind’ not to see that the most progressive elements in Québec were sovereignists (Beaudry and Comeau 2004). Critics point to Québec's social programmes, ‘the most advanced in Canada’, to argue that any alliance with forces from elsewhere in the country to change politics in Canada as a whole would be fruitless.…”
Section: Retrenchment Budget Surpluses and Nationalist Mobilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting debate in this respect is occurring at the margin of Québec's party system where a new party, Option citoyenne , spearheaded by feminist activists, is tackling ‘the great taboo of the national question’ by disentangling sovereignty and socialism and prioritising the latter (Conradi et al 2004). Published replies to this approach stated that one would have to be ‘blind’ not to see that the most progressive elements in Québec were sovereignists (Beaudry and Comeau 2004). Critics point to Québec's social programmes, ‘the most advanced in Canada’, to argue that any alliance with forces from elsewhere in the country to change politics in Canada as a whole would be fruitless.…”
Section: Retrenchment Budget Surpluses and Nationalist Mobilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%