2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icalt49669.2020.00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Prediction of Open Educational Resources A Metadata-based Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is clear that there is a significant need for automatic and intelligent metadata quality assessment in order to improve the discoverability, usability, and reusability of OERs [5]. Subsequently, a recently brief preliminary analysis was conducted on the current state of OER metadata in order to establish a quality prediction model [19]. As a result, we conclude that: (1) it is worthwhile and timely to consider analyzing OER metadata to improve OER-based services; and (2) there is a lack of intelligent prediction model that evaluates the quality of OERs based on their metadata to facilitate the quality control.…”
Section: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it is clear that there is a significant need for automatic and intelligent metadata quality assessment in order to improve the discoverability, usability, and reusability of OERs [5]. Subsequently, a recently brief preliminary analysis was conducted on the current state of OER metadata in order to establish a quality prediction model [19]. As a result, we conclude that: (1) it is worthwhile and timely to consider analyzing OER metadata to improve OER-based services; and (2) there is a lack of intelligent prediction model that evaluates the quality of OERs based on their metadata to facilitate the quality control.…”
Section: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, we conclude that: (1) it is worthwhile and timely to consider analyzing OER metadata to improve OER-based services; and (2) there is a lack of intelligent prediction model that evaluates the quality of OERs based on their metadata to facilitate the quality control. For the above mentioned reasons, in this paper, we attempt to follow-up, extend and evaluate the OER metadata quality prediction model suggested by [19], by using a video content based OER dataset, consisting of educational videos from Youtube. This was done in order to show the scalability and the generalizability of the proposed approach.…”
Section: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, ERs and OERs usually come with low-quality metadata [33], and they are isolated from other, content-wise similar ERs. That is one of the crucial reasons for lacking high-quality services, such as recommendation and search services, based on OERs [32]. Therefore, it is not surprising that the Semantic Web (SW) community shows increased interest in organising and classifying ERs, and enhancing the metadata in publicly available ER and OER [13,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is one of the important reasons for lacking high-quality services (e.g. recommendation and search services) based on OERs [32]. Therefore, it is not surprising that the Semantic Web (SW) community shows increased interest in organising and classifying ERs, and enhancing the metadata in publicly available ER and OER [13,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%