1994
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90104-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life in patients treated for head and neck cancer: A follow-up study 7 to 11 years after radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
149
0
9

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
149
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In many surveys that monitored the results of RT in patients with head and neck cancer, xerostomia usually was cited as the most prevalent late complication. [28][29][30][31][32] It has been reported that patient-reported xerostomia is correlated significantly with the mean RT dose to the parotid glands and the minor salivary glands in the oral cavity. 33 Our study further confirmed that RT technique is the unique variable affecting xerostomia in NPC survivors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many surveys that monitored the results of RT in patients with head and neck cancer, xerostomia usually was cited as the most prevalent late complication. [28][29][30][31][32] It has been reported that patient-reported xerostomia is correlated significantly with the mean RT dose to the parotid glands and the minor salivary glands in the oral cavity. 33 Our study further confirmed that RT technique is the unique variable affecting xerostomia in NPC survivors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation from conventional beam arrangement impairs the function of salivary glands and frequently results in permanent xerostomia [13]. The decreased secretion of saliva is responsible for altered taste sensation, impaired mastication and deglutition, compromised oral hygiene, and reduced quality of life [14,15]. Parotid glands account for approximately one-half to two-thirds of the total salivary output [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as rates of long-term remission and cure following therapy for certain malignancies improve, achieving this with a minimum of late side-effects is becoming more important. There is a great deal of evidence to suggest that various aspects of quality of life are reduced in survivors of cancer (Fobair et al, 1986;Berglund et al, 1991;Bjordal et al, 1994;Hjermstad and Kaasa, 1995;Greenberg et al, 1997). Therefore, assessment of quality of life after therapy is a vital part of determining the overall efficacy of different treatment regimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%