2018
DOI: 10.17507/tpls.0809.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Argumentation Models

Abstract: This study investigated the effectiveness of updated argumentation quality criteria. It evaluated the scale and quality of selected argumentation models judged by the new criteria. Effectiveness concerned content validity, reliability, and practicality of the criteria. The argumentation models were regarded as possessing good quality when they featured important elements in the criteria and received high scores. Five argumentation models were purposefully selected from an argumentative writing course. The mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise with (Marttunen,1994), that argumentation skills at the university level are still low. The low ability of scientific argumentation in students is influenced by several factors, first; in this case, the biology prospective at the Mandalika University of Education cannot identify the components or elements in an argument-or in other words, the biology prospective teacher at the Mandalika University of Education does not have a good knowledge of how to compilling an argument because knowledge of the elements of an argument is very important to be able to construct a good argument (Kaewpet, 2018). Second; It is undeniable that in research on argumentation ability, researchers use different instruments-this is in accordance with the purpose of doing a study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise with (Marttunen,1994), that argumentation skills at the university level are still low. The low ability of scientific argumentation in students is influenced by several factors, first; in this case, the biology prospective at the Mandalika University of Education cannot identify the components or elements in an argument-or in other words, the biology prospective teacher at the Mandalika University of Education does not have a good knowledge of how to compilling an argument because knowledge of the elements of an argument is very important to be able to construct a good argument (Kaewpet, 2018). Second; It is undeniable that in research on argumentation ability, researchers use different instruments-this is in accordance with the purpose of doing a study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%