The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.22164/isea.v5i1.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality in Qualitative Studies: The Case of Validity, Reliability and Generalizability

Abstract: The concern over the subject of quality judgement of qualitative research has led to the emergence of several varied positions. Whichever labels used in describing the positions, each has a distinctive character. To attempt to an understanding of the meaning of the quality criteria of validity, reliability and generalizability in qualitative research, this paper provides a review of relevant literature of recent years. To check on the extent of their reporting in research papers, a total of 15 accounting resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reliability in a qualitative study is achieved by explaining the methodological framework and analytical constructs (35). In the context of this study, several steps were taken to ensure reliability: an embedded design was chosen; separate IDIs guides was developed for trained physicians and policy makers/implementers; participants were purposively selected, that is those who are expected to play a key role in implementation (trained physicians and district- and provincial-level stakeholders); interviews were conducted in respondents language of choice (three out of eight stakeholders’ interviews were conducted in English, while the remaining were conducted in Urdu).…”
Section: Reliability Transferability and Dependabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability in a qualitative study is achieved by explaining the methodological framework and analytical constructs (35). In the context of this study, several steps were taken to ensure reliability: an embedded design was chosen; separate IDIs guides was developed for trained physicians and policy makers/implementers; participants were purposively selected, that is those who are expected to play a key role in implementation (trained physicians and district- and provincial-level stakeholders); interviews were conducted in respondents language of choice (three out of eight stakeholders’ interviews were conducted in English, while the remaining were conducted in Urdu).…”
Section: Reliability Transferability and Dependabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As credibility checks, we used triangulation (interviews combined with observational data), prolonged contact, and sought saturation in responses. 23,24 All data collected were stored on a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Acteprotected server and analyzed using Atlas.ti 8…”
Section: Data Management Measures and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and to assess validity, was then reviewed by the other authors (D.E.A., T.E.K.). 23,24 Disagreements were resolved by consensus.…”
Section: Q12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the criteria used in determining the quality of any research include reliability, validity and generalizability (Ali & Yusof, 2011). Reliability of a research measure/instrument is an indication of whether it measures anything at all.…”
Section: Reliability and Validity In Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%