Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: Issues and Possible Answers

Abstract

Qualitative evaluation studies can differ markedly from quantitative ones in both purpose and method and therefore must be understood and evaluated on their own terms. This article defines qualitative evaluation research and describes key parameters of quality to be considered when conducting and evaluating these studies in terms that take their epistemological assumptions and unique methods into account. Dimensions discussed include clarity in the research question, identifying the epistemological framework, using theory and prior knowledge effectively, addressing ethical issues, documenting all aspects of the study method, ensuring trustworthiness of the data, and communicating findings effectively.

Suggestions to Improve Social Work Journal Editorial and Peer-Review Processes: The San Antonio Response to the Miami Statement

“…Encourage continued study of the peer review process in order that it may become more evidenced based. "A more systematic approach is needed if we are to understand peer review as it is currently practiced, or to evaluate the pros and cons of any alternative approaches" (Jennings, 2006 Anastas, 2004;Drisko, 1997). 44.…”

A Pesquisa Sobre Política Educacional No Brasil: Análise De Aspectos Teórico-Epistemológicos

“…Authors such as Marshall and Rossman (2006) and Anastas (2004) agree that researchers display their epistemological engagements by explaining their paradigms and research traditions, which is fundamental to rigour in qualitative research.…”

Is Qualitative Research Becoming McDonaldized?

“…What began as a trickle of discussions of quality criteria in qualitative research (Lincoln and Guba, 1985;Maxwell, 1992) has turned into a deluge of attempts to lay out approaches to the evaluation of qualitative investigations (e.g. Mays and Pope, 2000;Yardley, 2000;Whittemore et al, 2001;Morse, 2003;Anastas, 2004). These various sets of criteria are very controversial, in that there are frequently alternative opinions voiced suggesting that they are inappropriate or too difficult to apply (for example, Barbour, 2001;Sparkes, 2001).…”