2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26020-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Improvements in End of Life Care: Insights from Two Collaboratives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[46][47][48][49] These quality improvement results are being confirmed by more rigorous external evaluations. [50][51][52][53][54] In the largest and most comprehensive evaluation of CCM-based improvement programs, investigators from the RAND Corporation found significantly better patient satisfaction with communication among heart failure and asthma patients in practices involved in system change.…”
Section: Clinical Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…[46][47][48][49] These quality improvement results are being confirmed by more rigorous external evaluations. [50][51][52][53][54] In the largest and most comprehensive evaluation of CCM-based improvement programs, investigators from the RAND Corporation found significantly better patient satisfaction with communication among heart failure and asthma patients in practices involved in system change.…”
Section: Clinical Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…48,49 Elements that contribute to successful organizational change include strong leadership support and sponsorship, development of a consistent organizational model, networking and information sharing among providers, engagement of the staff to collaborate in teamwork to test initiatives, and availability of performance data that feed back to organizational leaders to sustain changes. 50,51 Inadequate hospital policies on DNR discussion standards.…”
Section: Reasons For Inadequate Dnr Discussion and Recommended Stratmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, our work with 35 teams on improved care for persons with advanced heart or lung failure taught us specific insights about advance care planning and dyspnea relief, as well as about how to move conventional care systems toward optimal services. 21 Settling how one responsibly assesses the validity and reliability of insights arising from quality improvement is central to the debate about ethics. If the findings of quality improvement projects are largely worthwhile in shaping the care system, one would certainly not want to make it difficult to measure the changing system performance in order to guide changes.…”
Section: Box 1 Institutional Review Boardsmentioning
confidence: 99%