Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Workshop on Geographic Information Systems 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1097064.1097079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality-driven approximate methods for integrating GIS data

Abstract: GIS data distributed in local, state, federal, and private data clearinghouses are being made accessible through the efforts of organizations such as Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) and GeoData.gov. Many database applications, such as disaster management, transportation, and national infrastructure protection, need to access GIS information from such various data sources. In this paper we study how to answer keyword-based spatial queries approximately using information from heterogeneous GIS sources. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metadata was introduced in order to easily find and determine geospatial datasets coming from different sources such as local, regional or national governments, private sector, etc, 1 . Discovery metadata focuses on the bits of information necessary to allow catalogues to manage simple queries and make data known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metadata was introduced in order to easily find and determine geospatial datasets coming from different sources such as local, regional or national governments, private sector, etc, 1 . Discovery metadata focuses on the bits of information necessary to allow catalogues to manage simple queries and make data known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Hariharan et al (2005), they develop approximate algorithms for answering queries based on the local analysis of the query region. The quality of answers improves progressively as the local analysis goes deeper.…”
Section: Quality Driven Geospatial Data Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%