1992
DOI: 10.1016/0925-5273(92)90127-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality costing for total quality management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
79
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, Joseph Juran [1] proposed the graphical form of the CoQ model and the concept of quality costing. According to Porter and Rayner [14], this model supposes that more investment in prevention and appraisal activities will reduce failure costs and total quality cost. Most of Quality authorities have adopted the P-A-F model, as the American Society for Quality Control (ASQC) in 1970 and the British Standard Institute (BSI) in 1990, and it is employed by many organizations which use quality costing.…”
Section: Paf or Crosby's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, Joseph Juran [1] proposed the graphical form of the CoQ model and the concept of quality costing. According to Porter and Rayner [14], this model supposes that more investment in prevention and appraisal activities will reduce failure costs and total quality cost. Most of Quality authorities have adopted the P-A-F model, as the American Society for Quality Control (ASQC) in 1970 and the British Standard Institute (BSI) in 1990, and it is employed by many organizations which use quality costing.…”
Section: Paf or Crosby's Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because more failures are discovered at an earlier stage. In a manufacturing environment, it costs less to reject faulty material at the goods inward stage than it does to scrap a manufactured item that has had the faulty material incorporated into it [14].…”
Section: Classical View and Modern View Of Coqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Porter and Rayner [16], the main assumptions of the PAF model are that (1) investments in appraisal will reduce failure costs and (2) further investments in prevention activities will also reduce failure costs. The PAF classification allows practitioners to identify quality-related costs and expresses each category in terms of percentages of the total cost (e.g., refer to Figure 2).…”
Section: Quality Costingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of the use of QC systems and COQ data (e.g. Clark and Tannock, 1999;Porter and Rayner, 1992):…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 99%