Quality assessment of measurement instrument software with analytic hierarchy process

Velychko, Oleh; Hrabovskyi, Oleh; Gordiyenko, Tetyana

doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2019.175811

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 15 publications

(28 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Next, we determined the assessment of the component of the eigenvector from the known formula for finding the average geometric value [16,17,[19][20][21][22]:…”

Section: Materials and Methods To Study The Process Of Selection Of Rmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…where W is the ratio of consistency; r is the consistency index for a symmetric matrix; for matrix 4×4, this index is 0.9 [16,17,[19][20][21][22]. Next, we determine the global priorities of RFS relative to each of the selection criteria by entering the values of the normalized assessments of the vectors of priorities for RFS in relation to each of the criteria and the normalized assessments of the vectors of the criteria priorities into the table.…”

Section: Materials and Methods To Study The Process Of Selection Of Rmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Paper [20] developed approaches to improving the methods of testing and conformity assessment of specialized software for measuring equipment. The paper applied a hierarchy analysis method for three levels of requirements for the software tool, which is an interesting, but, according to the authors, a complicated approach to compiling the requirements directly within the method.…”

Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Devising a procedure for justifying the choice of reconnaissance-firing systems

Maistrenko

Khoma

Karavanov

et al. 2021

EEJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports a study into the special features of military (combat) activities at the present stage of military art development. The purpose was to subsequently define the basic requirements for reconnaissance-firing systems. The features under consideration are a rapid change in the situation, competition with an enemy for winning in time, accuracy, maneuverability, secrecy. They also involve a large amount of data that must be operated when deciding on combat use (hostilities). Other attributes of modern military (combat) activities are the consistency of operations and a clear structure of subordination; independence in maintenance and positioning. These data are useful and important because they make it possible to reasonably define the requirements for reconnaissance-firing systems. This paper has defined those requirements for reconnaissance-firing systems and such criteria for their selection that are predetermined by the specificity of military (combat) activities. The most important selection criteria include efficiency, accuracy, secrecy, robustness. Several actual reconnaissance-firing systems have been analyzed in order to demonstrate the use of the methodology. Specifically, «Kropyva» (Ukraine), «ArtOS» (Ukraine), «Obolon-A» (Ukraine), «Sokil» (Poland, Ukraine). A procedure for justifying the choice of reconnaissance-firing systems has been devised, taking into consideration the conditions of military (combat) activities, based on the method involving an analytic hierarchy process. A given procedure substantiates those selection criteria that were determined on the basis of patterns in modern military activities. From a practical point of view, the proposed methodology makes it possible to significantly reduce the time for planning an operation and considerably improve the validity of decisions by a commander (chief) regarding the choice of a reconnaissance-firing system and its further use in combat activities.

show abstract

“…Next, we determined the assessment of the component of the eigenvector from the known formula for finding the average geometric value [16,17,[19][20][21][22]:…”

Section: Materials and Methods To Study The Process Of Selection Of Rmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Materials and Methods To Study The Process Of Selection Of Rmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Devising a procedure for justifying the choice of reconnaissance-firing systems

Maistrenko

Khoma

Karavanov

et al. 2021

EEJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In [13][14][15], a comparative analysis of the general requirements in the documents and guidelines of the international and regional organizations of legislative metrology OIML and WELMEC regarding software testing for MI was carried out. An analysis of the regulatory framework for testing software for MIs at the national level was carried out to establish its suitability for compliance assessment.…”

Section: Disadvantagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Generalized Risk Assessment Procedure for Software Testing of Legally Regulated Measuring Instruments

Gaman,

Kursin,

Velychko

2023

MEM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The legal metrology covers measuring instruments (MI), the measurement results of which are used in calculations for consumed energy resources, in the fields of information protection, security, environmental protection, etc. Most modern MIs use microcontrollers or are controlled by computers. The software (SW) of such MIs provides an opportunity not only to automate the processes of measurement and calculation of results but also to ensure long-term storage and data transfer. The manufacturer is responsible for investigating and assessing all possible risks related to the MI SW. The task of the conformity assessment body is to assess the conformity of MIs adequately in general and software, in particular, to the established requirements based on the analysis of risk classes. Standards for information security risk management, information technology security assessment, and information technology security assessment criteria consider only general issues of software security and risk assessment without taking into account the scope of its application. The existing regulatory documents on software risk management were considered. Modern methods of assessing the risks of the MI SW were studied. To assess the risks of software of legally regulated MIs, a general classification of threats and vulnerabilities of MI SW was made. For choosing threats that affect functionality, only those that affect metrological characteristics during measurement are taken into account. Possible manifestations of the impact of threats on stored data can be their distortion or destruction, and transmissions of data can be data distortion during transmission or data loss due to a break in the telecommunications connection. A proposed simplified risk assessment methodology for assessing the compliance of MI SW without statistical data on the probabilities of threats and the amount of harm from the implementation of threats is presented. Risk is defined as the probability of harm due to a certain vulnerability, taking into account the conditional amount of harm.

show abstract

Quality assessment of measurement instrument software with analytic hierarchy process

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

Devising a procedure for justifying the choice of reconnaissance-firing systems

Devising a procedure for justifying the choice of reconnaissance-firing systems

Generalized Risk Assessment Procedure for Software Testing of Legally Regulated Measuring Instruments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About