2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00250-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Reachability for Open Interval Markov Chains

Abstract: Interval Markov chains extend classical Markov chains with the possibility to describe transition probabilities using intervals, rather than exact values. While the standard formulation of interval Markov chains features closed intervals, previous work has considered also open interval Markov chains, in which the intervals can also be open or halfopen.In this paper we focus on qualitative reachability problems for open interval Markov chains, which consider whether the optimal (maximum or minimum) probability … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theorem follows from Lemma 4.2, Lemma 4.5, Lemma 4.7, Proposition 2.2, the fact that the IMDP defined in this section can be constructed in polynomial time, and the fact that quantitative and qualitative problems for IMDPs can be solved in polynomial time, given that there exist polynomial-time algorithms for analogous problems on IMCs with the semantics adopted in this paper [PLSS13,CHK13,CK15,Spr18]. We add that the quantitative and qualitative problems for 1c-cdPTAs are PTIME-hard, following from the PTIME-hardness of the corresponding problems for MDPs [PT87, CDH10].…”
Section: :22mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The theorem follows from Lemma 4.2, Lemma 4.5, Lemma 4.7, Proposition 2.2, the fact that the IMDP defined in this section can be constructed in polynomial time, and the fact that quantitative and qualitative problems for IMDPs can be solved in polynomial time, given that there exist polynomial-time algorithms for analogous problems on IMCs with the semantics adopted in this paper [PLSS13,CHK13,CK15,Spr18]. We add that the quantitative and qualitative problems for 1c-cdPTAs are PTIME-hard, following from the PTIME-hardness of the corresponding problems for MDPs [PT87, CDH10].…”
Section: :22mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Computing P max [[C]],s (♦T ) and P min [[C]],s (♦T ) can be done for an IMC C simply by transforming the IMC by closing all of its (half-)open intervals, then employing a standard maximum/minimum reachability probability computation on the new, "closed" IMC (for example, the algorithms of [SVA06,CHK13]): the correctness of this approach is shown in [CK15]. Algorithms for qualitative problems of IMCs (with open, half-open and closed intervals) are given in [Spr18]. All of the aforementioned algorithms run in polynomial time in the size of the IMC, which is obtained as the sum over all states s, s ∈ S of the binary representation of the endpoints of P(s, s ), where rational numbers are encoded as the quotient of integers written in binary.…”
Section: Interval Markov Decision Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Often, probability distributions in these models are difficult to assess precisely during design time of a system. This shortcoming has led to interval MCs [15,35,50,54] and interval MDPs (also known as Bounded-parameter MDPs) [27,42,58], which allow for interval-labelled transitions. Analysis under interval Markov models is often too pessimistic:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%