2013
DOI: 10.1080/09515070.2013.792997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative meta-analysis of insight events in psychotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant events studies have revealed that there can often be a mismatch between what therapists and clients consider to be helpful, that is, a match was found in only about 30% of events (e.g., Martin & Stelmaczonek, 1988). Clients’ perspectives in intensive studies of specific type of events (e.g., insight events; Timulak & McElvaney, ) have also showed that clients often work further with the insight they attained during the session on their own (often doing so internally without sharing it with the therapist). Other findings suggest that the impact of a significant event may depend upon a lengthy client process preceding the event, one that makes the client more responsive to the event and the particular actions in it.…”
Section: Significant Events Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significant events studies have revealed that there can often be a mismatch between what therapists and clients consider to be helpful, that is, a match was found in only about 30% of events (e.g., Martin & Stelmaczonek, 1988). Clients’ perspectives in intensive studies of specific type of events (e.g., insight events; Timulak & McElvaney, ) have also showed that clients often work further with the insight they attained during the session on their own (often doing so internally without sharing it with the therapist). Other findings suggest that the impact of a significant event may depend upon a lengthy client process preceding the event, one that makes the client more responsive to the event and the particular actions in it.…”
Section: Significant Events Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a growing number of qualitative studies there is inevitably a corresponding accumulation of research findings. Systematic reviews have recently been supplemented by qualitative meta‐analyses (Timulak, ), a method that has evolved in other disciplines such as nursing but is relatively new to psychotherapy research (e.g., Timulak, ; Timulak et al., ; Timulak & McElvaney, ). Most recently, Levitt, Pomerville, and Surace () performed a comprehensive qualitative meta‐analysis of clients’ experiences of psychotherapy based on findings from 109 qualitative studies on individual therapy (1,414 clients).…”
Section: Qualitative Meta‐analyses Of Clients’ Experiences In Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPR research began to take hold in psychotherapy with the seminal work of Elliott (Elliott, 1986;Elliott & Shapiro, 1988) and the method has continued to grow and be modified for use in various contexts (e.g. Egeli, Brar, Larsen, & Yohani, 2013;Levitt & Piazza-Bonin, 2011;O'Hara & Schofield, 2008;Timulak & McElvaney, 2013). IPR was selected for its ability to elicit there-and-then experiences from participants, inviting them to discuss overt as well as unspoken thoughts and feelings as they remembered them to have occurred during the session (Kagan, 1984).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Investigating therapeutic processes requires a detailed analysis of what happens in therapy, how it is experienced by clients, and why they find it helpful or hindering. [22][23][24][25] Greater transparency regarding precisely how and why digital interventions achieve psychological change is likely to increase user trust, streamline interventions to their key components, and, consequently, increase reach. 18 Transdiagnostic interventions delivered in traditional and computerized formats have been shown to provide equivalent effects to disorder specific interventions of their type 26,27 and offer greater interactivity, flexibility and importantly, scalability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%