2020
DOI: 10.29333/ajqr/8586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Inquiry with Adolescents: Strategies for Fostering Rich Meaning Making in Group Interviews

Abstract: Qualitative inquiry with adolescents is challenging, especially in the field of educational research in which adults are often the gatekeepers of 'right' and 'wrong' answers. To help diminish power dynamics, group interviews are a common method for inquiry. However, the intense desire to fit in with a group of peers and the risks associated with confidentiality can influence how adolescents respond. In this article, I summarize common obstacles to group interviews with adolescents followed by strategies qualit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is what we are talking about. The use of the instrument is often considered capable of explore and allow personal memories in depth researchers adding concerns to the process production and clarity (Guthrie, 2019;Percy, Kostere, & Kostere, 2015). The interview process took place with three participants Indonesian lecturers to research academics independently English learning that was wanted and needed Students.…”
Section: Interview Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is what we are talking about. The use of the instrument is often considered capable of explore and allow personal memories in depth researchers adding concerns to the process production and clarity (Guthrie, 2019;Percy, Kostere, & Kostere, 2015). The interview process took place with three participants Indonesian lecturers to research academics independently English learning that was wanted and needed Students.…”
Section: Interview Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As André (2020) points out, "if QDA software is used for the analysis of qualitative data, there is a fundamental risk that the direction of analysis of the researchers is merely within the shape and cut of the corset of QDA programs" (p. 46). Such reliance on software can lead to oversimplified and mechanical coding, which may interfere with the interpretative process and limit the artistic, creative, and complex meaning-making aspects of qualitative research (Brailas & Sotiropoulou, 2023;DeHart, 2022;Guthrie, 2020). As André (2020) continues, researchers are at risk of not developing "neither their own paths of analytical organization and penetration of the data, nor paths that are independent of the programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%