2020
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative assessment of SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific antibody avidity by lateral flow immunochromatographic IgG/IgM antibody assay

Abstract: Knowledge of the precise timing of SARS-CoV-2 infection may be of clinical and epidemiological relevance. The presence of low-avidity IgGs has conventionally been considered an indicator of recent infection. Here, we carried out qualitative assessment of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody avidity using an urea (6M) dissociation test performed on a lateral flow immunochromatographic IgG/IgM device. We included a total of 76 serum specimens collected from 57 COVID-19 patients, of which 39 tested positive for both IgG … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibody avidity is defined as the strength of bivalent or multivalent interaction between antibody and epitope 46 . It is well described that antibody avidity increase over duration of infection and remained elevated, as expected to SARS-CoV-2 the same is observed, once low antibody avidity is showed during early infection and it is detected strongly after 3 weeks of symptom onset in patients recovered from COVID-19 47 . Moreover, a study demonstrated that anti-spike avidity was directed correlated with higher neutralizing antibodies titers 45 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Antibody avidity is defined as the strength of bivalent or multivalent interaction between antibody and epitope 46 . It is well described that antibody avidity increase over duration of infection and remained elevated, as expected to SARS-CoV-2 the same is observed, once low antibody avidity is showed during early infection and it is detected strongly after 3 weeks of symptom onset in patients recovered from COVID-19 47 . Moreover, a study demonstrated that anti-spike avidity was directed correlated with higher neutralizing antibodies titers 45 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Since avidity maturation is time dependent, avidity testing has been suggested as a diagnostic tool to estimate the time of acquisition of infection [ 11 , 35 ]. In our study we found a considerable variation over time in the maturation of avidity and the majority did not reach >80% in avidity even after 6 months of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though Luo et al 12 stated that there was a strong correlation between avidity or IgG towards RBD and days after onset of symptoms, their findings are also supporting the findings on low avidity of IgG towards SARS-CoV-2 antigens, as the authors had used the very low concentration of 3 M urea in their study. Navarro et al 22 stated an increase in avidity with time. This study is difficult to interprete in the context of the quantitative studies on avidity, as IgM and IgG avidity were measured without differentiation and their assay was only performed as qualtitative estimation.…”
Section: Low Avidity Of Igg Towards Sars-cov-2 Antigensmentioning
confidence: 97%