2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative and quantitative effects of constant light photoperiod on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) peripheral blood erythrocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in the present investigation, the changes observed in fish of the LD 24:0 group towards the end of the 2-month illumination period (increased haematocrit values and erythrocyte numbers) can be explained as a consequence of acute stress or, alternatively, as a stimulation of erythropoiesis by increased light exposure. Nevertheless, in another Fish Physiol Biochem (2006) 32:113-120 117 study carried out at the same time, these same fish showed (towards the end of the LD 24:0 protocol) increased numbers of immature erythrocytes at the same maturational stage, suggesting that erythropoiesis was actually depressed and not stimulated (Valenzuela et al 2006). Consequently, the acute stress induced by constant light, as described by Biswas et al (2006), may have stimulated the release of mature and immature erythrocytes from the spleen into circulation by splenic contraction Itazawa 1989, 1990), thereby increasing the haematocrit values and total erythrocyte numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, in the present investigation, the changes observed in fish of the LD 24:0 group towards the end of the 2-month illumination period (increased haematocrit values and erythrocyte numbers) can be explained as a consequence of acute stress or, alternatively, as a stimulation of erythropoiesis by increased light exposure. Nevertheless, in another Fish Physiol Biochem (2006) 32:113-120 117 study carried out at the same time, these same fish showed (towards the end of the LD 24:0 protocol) increased numbers of immature erythrocytes at the same maturational stage, suggesting that erythropoiesis was actually depressed and not stimulated (Valenzuela et al 2006). Consequently, the acute stress induced by constant light, as described by Biswas et al (2006), may have stimulated the release of mature and immature erythrocytes from the spleen into circulation by splenic contraction Itazawa 1989, 1990), thereby increasing the haematocrit values and total erythrocyte numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Photoperiod was reported to increase the growth and survival of larvae (Boeuf & Baille, 1999) of fish particularly in temperate regions through photo stimulation which induced feed intake and improved the feed conversion efficiency (Woiwode & Adelman, 1991). Effects of different photoperiods on growth of various fishes have been reported by a number of workers, notable among them are Davies et al (1986 a/ b); Imsland et al (1995); Arvedlund et al (2000); Purchase et al (2000); Erg眉n et al (2003); Rad et al (2006); Taylor et al (2006); Valenzuela et al (2006); Bonnet et al (2007); Askarian and Kousha (2009) and Yager and Yigit (2009). The developmental and maturation process are governed by genetic and environmental factors in fish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The physical factor such as photoperiod is known to increase the growth and survival rate of juvenile fish [3] particularly in temperate regions through processes such as photo stimulation, feed intake which improves the feed conversion efficiency [4][5][6]. Studies on the use of light intensities in different fish species have been carried out by many workers, notable among them are [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Simensen et al [16] pointed out that photoperiod act as a zeitgeber that controls growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%