Qualification of employees as a category of labor law

Abstract

Using scientific knowledge to identify, interpret the concepts of effectiveness, efficiency, criteria, and in conjunction with the need to comply with the principle of court independence, argues the complexity of the methodological point of view to develop objective evaluation criteria, including the qualification of judges or applicants on the vacancy of a judge. Due to the systematic connection with the main problems of enforcement of the mentioned body of judicial administration, the directions of optimization of the evaluation criteria during the exercise of control by the High Council of Justice on the activity of the courts (judges) are distinguished and characterized as an element of improving its efficiency. It is emphasized that the critical evaluation of the activity of the High Qualifications Commission of Judges of Ukraine in expert, scientific and political circles is carried out, as a rule, selectively, in terms of specifics, problems of realization of one or another aspect of administrative powers by a given body of judicial administration. However, quite often only the disadvantages, poor quality, manipulability, opacity of work are singled out, and the development of directions of optimization of evaluation criteria during the implementation of appropriate control is practically not carried out. It is noted that the Public Council of International Experts, the Public Council of Integrity, other members of the public will also be able to use standardized formats to adhere to the requirements of judicial ethics for integrity, to gather materials and evidence, to formulate malpractice assumptions, in its own supervisory activities over judges. commission of judges in the evaluation of the person. It is proposed to establish three criteria for qualification assessment: 1) professional competence; 2) motivational-psychological, communication-cognitive competence; 3) professional ethics and integrity.